CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

F5 BIG-IP

product · product:f5-big-ip single-source

Coverage
2
first 2026-05-17 → last 2026-10-21
Latest activity
2026-09-07
Insikt Group: the same six-tool stack followed thirteen unrelated CVEs into Exchange, SharePoint, FortiOS…
Peak priority
notable
1 notable · 1 routine
Targets
technology
sectors: technology
Sources cited
6
6 hosts

Defender insights

What each entry about F5 BIG-IP tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-09-07NOTABLEInsikt Group: the same six-tool stack followed thirteen unrelated CVEs into Exchange, SharePoint, FortiOS, Cisco IOS XE, F5 BIG-IP, GeoServer and Apache Shiro

2026-05-17ROUTINEF5 BIG-IP: iControl REST flaw lets a Manager-role account run commands and escape Appliance mode (CVE-2026-41225)

Exposure · detection

Story timeline

  1. 2026-09-07Recorded Future's H1 2026 Malware and Vulnerability Trends: two clusters reuse an identical post-exploitation tool stack across thirteen and ten unrelated initial CVEs
    researchInsikt Group: the same six-tool stack followed thirteen unrelated CVEs into Exchange, SharePoint, FortiOS, Cisco IOS XE, F5 BIG-IP, GeoServer and Apache Shiro
  2. 2026-05-17CVE-2026-41225: F5 BIG-IP iControl REST lets an authenticated Manager-role account run arbitrary commands and bypass Appliance mode (May 2026 quarterly)
    trending-vulnerabilitiesF5 BIG-IP: iControl REST flaw lets a Manager-role account run commands and escape Appliance mode (CVE-2026-41225)
ATT&CK techniques (13 across 9 tactics)

13 techniques observed across 2 entries about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v20.0 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • Initial AccessValid Accounts · Exploit Public-Facing Application
  • ExecutionCommand and Scripting Interpreter · Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell · Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell · Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell
  • PersistenceValid Accounts · Server Software Component: Web Shell
  • Privilege EscalationExploitation for Privilege Escalation · Valid Accounts
  • StealthValid Accounts
  • DiscoverySystem Information Discovery
  • CollectionData from Local System
  • Command and ControlApplication Layer Protocol: Web Protocols · Ingress Tool Transfer
  • ExfiltrationExfiltration Over C2 Channel

Initial Access TA0001

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×1

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Execution TA0002

T1059Command and Scripting Interpreter×1

Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries. These interfaces and languages provide ways of interacting with computer systems and are a common feature across many different platforms. Most systems come with some built-in command-line interface and scripting capabilities, for example, macOS and Linux distributions include some flavor of Unix Shell while Windows installations include the Windows Command Shell and PowerShell.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.001Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell×1

Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution. PowerShell is a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment included in the Windows operating system. PowerShell can also be installed on Linux and macOS. Adversaries can use PowerShell to perform a number of actions, including discovery of information and execution of code. Examples include the <code>Start-Process</code> cmdlet which can be used to run an executable and the <code>Invoke-Command</code> cmdlet which runs a command locally or on a remote computer (though administrator permissions are required to use PowerShell to connect to remote systems).

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.003Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution. The Windows command shell (cmd) is the primary command prompt on Windows systems. The Windows command prompt can be used to control almost any aspect of a system, with various permission levels required for different subsets of commands. The command prompt can be invoked remotely via Remote Services such as SSH.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.004Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell×1

Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution. Unix shells are the primary command prompt on Linux, macOS, and ESXi systems, though many variations of the Unix shell exist (e.g. sh, ash, bash, zsh, etc.) depending on the specific OS or distribution. Unix shells can control every aspect of a system, with certain commands requiring elevated privileges.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

T1505.003Server Software Component: Web Shell×1

Adversaries may backdoor web servers with web shells to establish persistent access to systems. A Web shell is a Web script that is placed on an openly accessible Web server to allow an adversary to access the Web server as a gateway into a network. A Web shell may provide a set of functions to execute or a command-line interface on the system that hosts the Web server.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation×1

Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Security constructs such as permission levels will often hinder access to information and use of certain techniques, so adversaries will likely need to perform privilege escalation to include use of software exploitation to circumvent those restrictions.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-17/cve-2026-41225-f5-big-ip-big-iq-icontrol-rest-manager-role-a · ATT&CK page ↗

Discovery TA0007

T1082System Information Discovery×1

An adversary may attempt to get detailed information about the operating system and hardware, including version, patches, hotfixes, service packs, and architecture. Adversaries may use this information to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions. This behavior is distinct from Local Storage Discovery which is an adversary's discovery of local drive, disks and/or volumes.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Collection TA0009

T1005Data from Local System×1

Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1071.001Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols×1

Adversaries may communicate using application layer protocols associated with web traffic to avoid detection/network filtering by blending in with existing traffic. Commands to the remote system, and often the results of those commands, will be embedded within the protocol traffic between the client and server.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

T1105Ingress Tool Transfer×1

Adversaries may transfer tools or other files from an external system into a compromised environment. Tools or files may be copied from an external adversary-controlled system to the victim network through the command and control channel or through alternate protocols such as ftp. Once present, adversaries may also transfer/spread tools between victim devices within a compromised environment (i.e. Lateral Tool Transfer).

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel×1

Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an existing command and control channel. Stolen data is encoded into the normal communications channel using the same protocol as command and control communications.

Evidence: 2026-09-07/recordedfuture-h1-2026-tool-stack-reuse · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about F5 BIG-IP (2)

2026-09-07 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLENATOB2

Recorded Future's H1 2026 Malware and Vulnerability Trends: two clusters reuse an identical post-exploitation tool stack across thirteen and ten unrelated initial CVEs

Recorded Future's Insikt Group published its H1 2026 Malware and Vulnerability Trends report on 3 September 2026, tracking 215 actively exploited CVEs in the first half of 2026, up 34% from 161 in H1 2025 (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03). Of those, 176 (82%) were network-accessible and 146 (68%) could be exploited without prior authentication; 142 of those 146 combined both properties, and 60 of 82 remote-code-execution CVEs combined network reachability, no authentication requirement and code execution in a single package (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03).

The report's most actionable finding for defenders is that post-exploitation tool-stack reuse persists across otherwise-unrelated initial-access vulnerabilities, regardless of vendor or product family (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03). A cluster the report designates StrikeShark applied an identical six-tool post-exploitation stack (SharkLoader, Cobalt Strike Beacon, FScan, Searchall, Pillager Stealer and SharpGPOAbuse) across thirteen separate CVEs spanning 2016 through 2025, reaching Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, Fortinet FortiOS, Cisco IOS XE, F5 BIG-IP, GeoServer and Apache Shiro (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03); SharkLoader itself was previously profiled by Kaspersky's GReAT, which found it deploying Cobalt Strike via "Perfect DLL Hijacking" in a campaign whose confirmed victims spanned government and diplomatic entities, software developers and organizations in several other sectors and regions (Kaspersky Securelist, 2026-06-24). Separately, Storm-1175 linked Mimikatz, Impacket, PsExec, Rclone and Medusa ransomware across ten different initial CVEs; a China-linked cluster the report designates SHADOW-EARTH-053 separately reused Mimikatz following exploitation of CVE-2021-26855 in Microsoft Exchange Server (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03). Insikt Group mapped 114 of the 215 CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK: exploitation of a public-facing application was associated with 77 CVEs (68%), and 50 of those 77 also co-occurred with PowerShell, Windows Command Shell or Unix Shell execution; every one of the 28 web-shell-associated CVEs also carried the public-facing-application technique. The next most frequently associated post-exploitation behaviors across the mapped CVEs were system-information discovery, collection of data from the local system, transfer of further tooling into the compromised environment, and exfiltration over the command-and-control channel or web-protocol-based C2 traffic (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03).

The report's own defender-facing conclusion is explicit: because the same limited tool stack recurs regardless of which vulnerability supplied the initial foothold, detection engineering should chain exploitation telemetry from public-facing systems through to the post-exploitation behaviors these clusters repeat (credential dumping, remote-service execution via native administration mechanisms, bulk outbound data transfer, and ransomware staging) rather than treating each CVE alert as an isolated, one-off event (Recorded Future, 2026-09-03).

Threat actors reused post-exploitation playbooks across different initial vulnerabilities; StrikeShark applied the same six-tool stack across thirteen CVEs, while Storm-1175 linked credential theft, remote execution, data transfer, and ransomware tooling across ten.

In the StrikeShark campaign, SharkLoader, Cobalt Strike Beacon, FScan, Searchall, Pillager Stealer, and SharpGPOAbuse were linked to the same thirteen CVEs. Those vulnerabilities spanned 2016 through 2025 and affected Microsoft Exchange and SharePoint, Fortinet FortiOS, Cisco IOS XE, F5 BIG-IP, GeoServer, Apache Shiro, and other public-facing technologies.

50 of the 77 CVEs associated with the exploitation of public-facing applications were also linked to PowerShell, Windows Command Shell, or Unix Shell, and all 28 web-shell-associated CVEs also included T1190.

Recorded Future (Insikt Group) 2026-09-03

Builds on: Kaspersky GReAT: "StrikeShark" loader deploys Cobalt Strike via "Perfect DLL Hijacking" against…

annual-report07 Sep 04:43Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →

2026-05-17 · view entry permalink →

ROUTINECVE-2026-41225updatedNATOA2

CVE-2026-41225: F5 BIG-IP iControl REST lets an authenticated Manager-role account run arbitrary commands and bypass Appliance mode (May 2026 quarterly)

F5 announced on 2026-05-13 the fixes in its quarterly security notification (F5 K000160932; SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14), among them CVE-2026-41225 in BIG-IP iControl REST: an authenticated attacker with at least the Manager role can create configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands (ENISA EUVD-2026-29986). F5 says the flaw lets a highly privileged attacker with network access to the iControl REST endpoint through the BIG-IP management port or self IP addresses escalate privileges or bypass Appliance mode restrictions, crossing a security boundary in Appliance mode deployments, and that there is no data-plane exposure (SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14). F5 scores it CVSS 4.0 8.6 (ENISA EUVD-2026-29986; SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14), and NCSC-NL lists a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1 with a changed scope (NCSC-NL NCSC-2026-0162, 2026-05-15). Affected are BIG-IP 21.0.0 before version 21.0.0.2, 17.5.0 before version 17.5.1.6 and 17.1.0 before version 17.1.3.2, with the 16.1 branch listed as affected and, being past end of technical support, not evaluated (ENISA EUVD-2026-29986). SecurityWeek counts over 19 high-severity and 32 medium-severity fixes across BIG-IP, BIG-IQ and NGINX in the same notification, none of them exploited in the wild as of 2026-05-14 (SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14), and NCSC-NL's advisory lists 43 CVEs for BIG-IP and BIG-IQ (NCSC-NL NCSC-2026-0162, 2026-05-15).

A vulnerability exists in iControl REST where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Manager role can create configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands.

ENISA EUVD (EUVD-2026-29986) 2026-05-13

This vulnerability may allow a highly privileged attacker with network access to the affected iControl REST endpoint through the BIG-IP management port or self IP addresses to escalate their privileges or bypass Appliance mode restrictions.

None of these vulnerabilities appears to have been exploited in the wild.

SecurityWeek 2026-05-14
Correctionrun 2026-10-21T1148Z-auditactionsaffected_productsbodyclassificationcvesevent_dateevidenceheadlineprioritysectorssourcessourcing_notesummarytechniquestitleverification

CVE-2026-41225 is listed for BIG-IP only, in 21.0.0 before version 21.0.0.2, 17.5.0 before version 17.5.1.6 and 17.1.0 before version 17.1.3.2, with the 16.1 branch past end of technical support and not evaluated (ENISA EUVD-2026-29986); F5 published it on 2026-05-13 (SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14). The prerequisite is an authenticated account with at least the Manager role and network access to iControl REST through the management port or a self IP address, and F5 says there is no data-plane exposure (SecurityWeek, 2026-05-14); no source describes a credential-theft chain, a European public-sector deployment base or monitoring guidance. The secondary list of CVE ids grouped by flaw class did not match NCSC-NL's advisory, which gives the cleartext SSH-password exposure and the SNMP-object privilege escalation as separate flaws with their own ids (NCSC-NL NCSC-2026-0162, 2026-05-15). F5's own score is CVSS 4.0 8.6 (ENISA EUVD-2026-29986); the 9.1 comes from NCSC-NL as a CVSS 3.1 score with a changed scope (NCSC-NL NCSC-2026-0162, 2026-05-15).

vulnerability17 May 05:00Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Vulns1
  • Research1

Source distribution

  • advisories.ncsc.nl1 (17%)
  • euvd.enisa.europa.eu1 (17%)
  • my.f5.com1 (17%)
  • recordedfuture.com1 (17%)
  • securelist.com1 (17%)
  • securityweek.com1 (17%)