CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

GreatXML

trend · trend:greatxml-bitlocker-bypass-2026

Nightmare Eclipse's unpatched BitLocker/WinRE bypass with a public PoC.

Coverage
1
first 2026-06-12 → last 2026-06-12
Latest activity
2026-06-12
"GreatXML": unpatched BitLocker bypass via crafted XML on the recovery partition, PoC public, practical…
Peak priority
high
1 high
Targets
public-sector
sectors: public-sector
Sources cited
4
4 hosts

Relationships explore in graph

Typed, source-stated connections from the entity registry; each edge cites the entry whose reporting establishes it.

exploited by

Story timeline

  1. 2026-06-12"GreatXML": unpatched BitLocker bypass via crafted XML on the recovery partition, PoC public, practical severity contested
    active-threats
ATT&CK techniques (2 across 2 tactics)

2 techniques observed across 1 entry about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.2 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • PersistencePre-OS Boot · Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware
  • StealthPre-OS Boot · Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware

Persistence TA0003

T1542Pre-OS Boot×1

Adversaries may abuse Pre-OS Boot mechanisms as a way to establish persistence on a system. During the booting process of a computer, firmware and various startup services are loaded before the operating system. These programs control flow of execution before the operating system takes control.

Evidence: 2026-06-12/greatxml-unpatched-bitlocker-bypass-via-crafted-xml-on-the-r · ATT&CK page ↗

T1542.001Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware×1

Adversaries may modify system firmware to persist on systems.The BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) and The Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) or Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) are examples of system firmware that operate as the software interface between the operating system and hardware of a computer.

Evidence: 2026-06-12/greatxml-unpatched-bitlocker-bypass-via-crafted-xml-on-the-r · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1542Pre-OS Boot×1

Adversaries may abuse Pre-OS Boot mechanisms as a way to establish persistence on a system. During the booting process of a computer, firmware and various startup services are loaded before the operating system. These programs control flow of execution before the operating system takes control.

Evidence: 2026-06-12/greatxml-unpatched-bitlocker-bypass-via-crafted-xml-on-the-r · ATT&CK page ↗

T1542.001Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware×1

Adversaries may modify system firmware to persist on systems.The BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) and The Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) or Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) are examples of system firmware that operate as the software interface between the operating system and hardware of a computer.

Evidence: 2026-06-12/greatxml-unpatched-bitlocker-bypass-via-crafted-xml-on-the-r · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about GreatXML (1)

2026-06-12 · view entry permalink →

HIGH

"GreatXML": unpatched BitLocker bypass via crafted XML on the recovery partition, PoC public, practical severity contested

The researcher operating as Nightmare Eclipse (also tracked as Chaotic Eclipse) published GreatXML on 11 June, a working proof-of-concept that bypasses BitLocker full-volume encryption and spawns a SYSTEM command prompt inside the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE), with no CVE assigned and no Microsoft patch available (SecurityWeek, 2026-06-11). The technique places a crafted unattend.xml at the root of the recovery partition plus a second malformed XML under Recovery/, then reboots into WinRE; the Microsoft Defender Offline scan path processes the attacker-controlled XML while the volume is unlocked. Per the researcher, "any Windows machine becomes vulnerable to GreatXML as soon as Defender's offline scanning is initiated", i.e. the bypass arms itself once an offline scan has ever run on the host (SecurityWeek, 2026-06-11). Independent researcher Will Dormann disputes the practical severity, noting that triggering the prerequisite Defender Offline scan requires an existing Windows logon with admin credentials; an attacker in that position could already disable BitLocker outright (The Register, 2026-06-11). NCSC-CH is tracking the disclosure as part of the same researcher's zero-day series (BlueHammer, RedSun, UnDefend, YellowKey, GreenPlasma, RoguePlanet, RoguePlanet covered 2026-06-11) (NCSC-CH CSH, 2026-06-11). Maps to T1542.001 (Pre-OS Boot) territory: code execution from the recovery path while the BitLocker-protected volume is mounted.

Why it matters to us: evil-maid and stolen-laptop scenarios against BitLocker-protected fleets get cheaper where an offline scan has previously run. Until a patch lands: audit recovery-partition contents for unexpected unattend.xml/ReAgent.xml modifications, require TPM+PIN pre-boot authentication on high-value mobile assets, and weigh reagentc /disable on machines where recovery capability is dispensable.

threat12 Jun 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Threats1

Source distribution

  • attack.mitre.org1 (25%)
  • security-hub.ncsc.admin.ch1 (25%)
  • securityweek.com1 (25%)
  • theregister.com1 (25%)