2026-07-30HIGHexploitedCisco patches an actively exploited hardcoded credential in Secure FMC: CVSS 5.3, but Cisco rates the advisory High for privilege-escalation chaining
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
product · product:cisco-secure-firewall-management-center single-source
Coverage
2
first 2026-07-30 → last 2026-09-30
Latest activity
2026-09-29
Cisco patches an actively exploited hardcoded credential in Secure FMC: CVSS 5.3, but Cisco rates the…
Peak priority
high
2 high
Targets
public-sector
sectors: public-sector, energy, telco
Sources cited
8
4 hosts
Action items (4)
Do-now tasks recorded on the entries about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, newest first. Check the date before acting on an older one.
- Upgrade every on-premises Secure FMC on 7.0 and earlier, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.7 and 10.0 to its hardening release (7.0.10, 7.2.12, 7.4.8, 7.6.6, 7.7.13 or 10.0.2), including any already carrying the earlier hot fix; Cisco states no workaround exists, so restricting reachability is a containment step and not a substitute.2026-07-30CVE-2026-20316
- On every FMC whose web interface has been reachable, run Cisco's check in expert mode (zgrep "package_info.license" over /var/log/messages, a hit naming /var/tmp/license.tmp indicates possible exploitation) and treat a hit as a compromise to work with Cisco TAC, since Cisco states its hot fixes may not address an existing compromise.2026-07-30CVE-2026-20316
- Upgrade every Secure FMC to its September 2026 hardening release (7.0 and earlier to 7.0.10, 7.2 to 7.2.12, 7.4 to 7.4.8, 7.6 to 7.6.6, 7.7 to 7.7.13, 10.0 to 10.0.2, 10.1 to 10.1.0). Cisco replaced the earlier per-train hot fixes with these releases on 2026-09-16; there is no workaround, and no configuration makes an FMC non-vulnerable.2026-08-04CVE-2026-20079 +2
- Run Cisco's revised compromise check on every FMC that has been network-reachable since 2026-03-04: in expert mode,2026-08-04CVE-2026-20079 +2
zgrep "package_info.*license" /var/log/messages*, a hit naming /var/tmp/license.tmp means the chain reached the package-install step, and Cisco directs those cases to TAC rather than to self-remediation.
Defender insights
What each entry about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center tells a defender to do, newest first.
Detection
Story timeline
- 2026-08-04CVE-2026-20079, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center: unauthenticated authentication bypass to root, unpatched for five months and only exploitable in a post-boot window (CVSS 10.0)
- 2026-07-30CVE-2026-20316: Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center ships a static low-privilege account in its web interface, and Cisco confirms active exploitation
Hunting pivots
CVEs (exploited first)
Releases covered
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center ×2
ATT&CK techniques (8 across 7 tactics)
8 techniques observed across 2 entries about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v20.0 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)
- Initial AccessValid Accounts: Default Accounts · Exploit Public-Facing Application
- PersistenceValid Accounts: Default Accounts · Server Software Component: Web Shell
- Privilege EscalationExploitation for Privilege Escalation · Valid Accounts: Default Accounts
- StealthValid Accounts: Default Accounts
- Defense ImpairmentDisable or Modify Tools
- Command and ControlApplication Layer Protocol: DNS · Protocol Tunneling
- ImpactData Encrypted for Impact
Initial Access TA0001
T1078.001Valid Accounts: Default Accounts×2
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a default account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Default accounts are those that are built-into an OS, such as the Guest or Administrator accounts on Windows systems. Default accounts also include default factory/provider set accounts on other types of systems, software, or devices, including the root user account in AWS, the root user account in ESXi, and the default service account in Kubernetes.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · 2026-07-30/cisco-secure-fmc-cve-2026-20316-static-credential-exploited · ATT&CK page ↗
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×2
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · 2026-07-30/cisco-secure-fmc-cve-2026-20316-static-credential-exploited · ATT&CK page ↗
Persistence TA0003
T1078.001Valid Accounts: Default Accounts×2
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a default account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Default accounts are those that are built-into an OS, such as the Guest or Administrator accounts on Windows systems. Default accounts also include default factory/provider set accounts on other types of systems, software, or devices, including the root user account in AWS, the root user account in ESXi, and the default service account in Kubernetes.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · 2026-07-30/cisco-secure-fmc-cve-2026-20316-static-credential-exploited · ATT&CK page ↗
T1505.003Server Software Component: Web Shell×1
Adversaries may backdoor web servers with web shells to establish persistent access to systems. A Web shell is a Web script that is placed on an openly accessible Web server to allow an adversary to access the Web server as a gateway into a network. A Web shell may provide a set of functions to execute or a command-line interface on the system that hosts the Web server.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
Privilege Escalation TA0004
T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation×1
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Security constructs such as permission levels will often hinder access to information and use of certain techniques, so adversaries will likely need to perform privilege escalation to include use of software exploitation to circumvent those restrictions.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
T1078.001Valid Accounts: Default Accounts×2
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a default account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Default accounts are those that are built-into an OS, such as the Guest or Administrator accounts on Windows systems. Default accounts also include default factory/provider set accounts on other types of systems, software, or devices, including the root user account in AWS, the root user account in ESXi, and the default service account in Kubernetes.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · 2026-07-30/cisco-secure-fmc-cve-2026-20316-static-credential-exploited · ATT&CK page ↗
Stealth TA0005
T1078.001Valid Accounts: Default Accounts×2
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a default account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Default accounts are those that are built-into an OS, such as the Guest or Administrator accounts on Windows systems. Default accounts also include default factory/provider set accounts on other types of systems, software, or devices, including the root user account in AWS, the root user account in ESXi, and the default service account in Kubernetes.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · 2026-07-30/cisco-secure-fmc-cve-2026-20316-static-credential-exploited · ATT&CK page ↗
Defense Impairment TA0112
T1685Disable or Modify Tools×1
Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
Command and Control TA0011
T1071.004Application Layer Protocol: DNS×1
Adversaries may communicate using the Domain Name System (DNS) application layer protocol to avoid detection/network filtering by blending in with existing traffic. Commands to the remote system, and often the results of those commands, will be embedded within the protocol traffic between the client and server.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
T1572Protocol Tunneling×1
Adversaries may tunnel network communications to and from a victim system within a separate protocol to avoid detection/network filtering and/or enable access to otherwise unreachable systems. Tunneling involves explicitly encapsulating a protocol within another. This behavior may conceal malicious traffic by blending in with existing traffic and/or provide an outer layer of encryption (similar to a VPN). Tunneling could also enable routing of network packets that would otherwise not reach their intended destination, such as SMB, RDP, or other traffic that would be filtered by network appliances or not routed over the Internet.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
Impact TA0040
T1486Data Encrypted for Impact×1
Adversaries may encrypt data on target systems or on large numbers of systems in a network to interrupt availability to system and network resources. They can attempt to render stored data inaccessible by encrypting files or data on local and remote drives and withholding access to a decryption key. This may be done in order to extract monetary compensation from a victim in exchange for decryption or a decryption key (ransomware) or to render data permanently inaccessible in cases where the key is not saved or transmitted.
Evidence: 2026-08-04/cve-2026-20079-cisco-secure-fmc-auth-bypass-root-hotfix · ATT&CK page ↗
Entries about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (2)
Co-occurring entities
Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.
- Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Java deserialization RCE via External Database Access allowlist (CVSS 9.8), not reported exploited×1
- Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center sftunnel arbitrary file write to root (CVSS 9.9), requires existing low-privilege device credentials, not reported exploited×1
- Cisco Security Cloud Control Firewall Management×1
- CVE-2026-20079, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center web interface: unauthenticated authentication bypass to root via a boot-time csm_processes session (CVSS 10.0, CWE-288); disclosed 2026-03-04 with no fix, per-train hot fixes added to the advisory 2026-07-31; Cisco reports no known malicious use, VulnCheck built a working exploit×1
- CVE-2026-20316; Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center ships a static low-privilege account in its web interface, and Cisco confirms exploitation has been ongoing×1
- Cyclops Blink×1
- Qilin×1
- Sandworm×1
Where this entity is cited
Source distribution
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.com5 (62%)
- blog.talosintelligence.com1 (12%)
- cisa.gov1 (12%)
- vulncheck.com1 (12%)
All cited sources (8)
- blog.talosintelligence.comCisco Taloshttps://blog.talosintelligence.com/fmc-ongoing-exploitation/
- cisa.govCISA KEV cataloghttps://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.comCisco PSIRT (CVE-2026-20242 advisory)https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-javarce-y2NypXwk
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.comCisco PSIRT (CVE-2026-20324 advisory)https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-sftunn-codex-c3O4Jft2
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.comCisco PSIRThttps://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-static-cred-BET3Cjh
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.comCisco PSIRT (advance notification)https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-notice-jfxK98ZP
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.comCisco PSIRThttps://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-onprem-fmc-authbypass-5JPp45V2
- vulncheck.comVulnCheckhttps://www.vulncheck.com/blog/cisco-fmc-auth-bypass-cve-2026-20079