ctipilot.ch

Ivanti Xtraction < 2026.2 external control of file name/path (CWE-73, CVSS 9.6) — arbitrary file read + HTML write to web tree; auth required

cve · CVE-2026-8043

Coverage timeline
1
first 2026-05-14 → last 2026-05-18
Peak priority
high
1 high
Sources cited
3
3 hosts
Sections touched
1
trending-vulnerabilities
Co-occurring entities
0
no co-occurrence
ATT&CK techniques
4
pinned v19.1 · see below

ATT&CK techniques

4 techniques observed across 1 entry — derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.1 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

Initial Access TA0001

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×1

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Evidence: 2026-05-14/cve-2026-8043-ivanti-xtraction-external-file-control-cvss-9 · ATT&CK page ↗

Execution TA0002

T1059Command and Scripting Interpreter×1

Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries. These interfaces and languages provide ways of interacting with computer systems and are a common feature across many different platforms. Most systems come with some built-in command-line interface and scripting capabilities, for example, macOS and Linux distributions include some flavor of Unix Shell while Windows installations include the Windows Command Shell and PowerShell.

Evidence: 2026-05-14/cve-2026-8043-ivanti-xtraction-external-file-control-cvss-9 · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1505.003Server Software Component: Web Shell×1

Adversaries may backdoor web servers with web shells to establish persistent access to systems. A Web shell is a Web script that is placed on an openly accessible Web server to allow an adversary to access the Web server as a gateway into a network. A Web shell may provide a set of functions to execute or a command-line interface on the system that hosts the Web server.

Evidence: 2026-05-14/cve-2026-8043-ivanti-xtraction-external-file-control-cvss-9 · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel×1

Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an existing command and control channel. Stolen data is encoded into the normal communications channel using the same protocol as command and control communications.

Evidence: 2026-05-14/cve-2026-8043-ivanti-xtraction-external-file-control-cvss-9 · ATT&CK page ↗

Story timeline

  1. 2026-05-14CVE-2026-8043 Ivanti Xtraction external file control (CVSS 9.6) plus EPM SQL-injection-to-RCE and vTM admin OS-command injection — May 2026 advisory batch, no ITW
    trending-vulnerabilitiesCVE-2026-8043 Ivanti Xtraction external file control (CVSS 9.6) plus EPM SQL-injection-to-RCE and vTM admin OS-command injection — May 2026 advisory batch, no

Where this entity is cited

  • trending-vulnerabilities1

Source distribution

  • cert.ssi.gouv.fr1 (33%)
  • ivanti.com1 (33%)
  • securityweek.com1 (33%)

explore in graph

Entries about Ivanti Xtraction < 2026.2 external control of file name/path (CWE-73, CVSS 9.6) — arbitrary file read + HTML write to web tree; auth required (1)

2026-05-14 · view entry permalink →

CVE-2026-8043 Ivanti Xtraction external file control (CVSS 9.6) plus EPM SQL-injection-to-RCE and vTM admin OS-command injection — May 2026 advisory batch, no ITW

Ivanti's May 2026 Security Update (2026-05-12) discloses four product-line advisories. The headline issue is CVE-2026-8043 in Ivanti Xtraction prior to 2026.2 — a CWE-73 (external control of file name or path) flaw rated 9.6 on CVSS 3.1 with PR:L (low-privilege auth required, not admin) and AC:L — letting a remote authenticated attacker read arbitrary server-side files and write arbitrary HTML into the web directory. The dual primitive is the operational concern: arbitrary HTML write into the web tree is a viable stored-XSS staging point against higher-privileged Xtraction users, and combined with the file-read primitive is sufficient to chain to web-shell drop in environments where the attacker can guess or read deployment paths.

Ivanti's EPM advisory in the same cycle addresses a SQL-injection vulnerability in the EPM web console prior to 2024 SU6 that any remote authenticated user can leverage. The relevant defender note is technique class, not just CVSS: SQL injection against EPM's SQL Server back-end is the well-documented xp_cmdshell (T1059) or stored-procedure code-execution pivot ransomware initial-access brokers have weaponised against EPM and analogous endpoint-management platforms for years. The third advisory covers an OS-command injection (T1059) in the Ivanti Virtual Traffic Manager (vTM) admin interface prior to 22.9r4, allowing an admin-credentialed attacker to inject OS commands and achieve full appliance RCE. Ivanti states no in-the-wild exploitation as of 2026-05-12 for any of the four advisories; CERT-FR (CERTFR-2026-AVI-0576, 2026-05-13) and SecurityWeek (2026-05-13) corroborated the disclosure within 24 hours.

Affected and fixed versions (per the vendor batch): Ivanti Xtraction < 2026.2 → 2026.2; Ivanti EPM ≤ 2024 SU6 → 2024 SU6; Ivanti vTM < 22.9r4 → 22.9r4. Inclusion gate cleared: CVE-2026-8043 sits in the ENISA EUVD CVSS 9.0–10.0 critical band on the vendor's CVSS 3.1 score. Detection priority for SOCs that operate Ivanti: monitor EPM web-console request logs for stored-procedure invocation patterns originating from non-administrative user contexts (T1505.003 web-shell + T1059 command-line), and audit Xtraction installations for any HTML file in the web tree whose timestamp post-dates 2026-04-01 and whose content does not match a release manifest. ATT&CK: T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application, T1505.003 Web Shell, T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter, T1190+T1505.003 chained for the Xtraction file-write to staged web-shell route. Xtraction is commonly deployed on internal management networks where egress controls are looser than perimeter — a successful T1041 (exfiltration over C2) post-compromise can go unnoticed longer than perimeter-edge compromises.

vulnerability14 May 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding ↗