CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

ScreenConnect: commands pushed through Run Command to at least 288 managed endpoints at 48 Huntress customers within 90 minutes on 2026-11-1

cve · CVE-2026-127063

Coverage
1
first 2026-11-12 → last 2026-11-14
Latest activity
2026-11-14
ScreenConnect SCKit: second wave hits on-prem; disable RMM+, update technician clients to 26.6.5+
Peak priority
high
1 high
Targets
technology
sectors: technology
Sources cited
8
8 hosts

Action items (1)

Do-now tasks recorded on the entries about CVE-2026-127063, newest first. Check the date before acting on an older one.

  • On every ScreenConnect instance your organisation or its IT providers run, disable the RMM+ extension immediately, verify it stays disabled and do not re-enable or reinstall it (on-premises instances by hand; ConnectWise removed it from cloud-hosted ones), review Run Command and Toolbox history and the instance audit logs for executions nobody started, including before 2026-11-11, and check managed endpoints for a second ScreenConnect client service; open no interactive session to a suspect host, use EDR live response or WinRM, because a session can trigger the toolkit to spread to the technician's workstation; update every technician host client to ScreenConnect 26.6.5 or later, because a cloud-console update does not update them.
    2026-11-12CVE-2026-127063

Defender insights

What each entry about CVE-2026-127063 tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-11-12HIGHScreenConnect SCKit: second wave hits on-prem; disable RMM+, update technician clients to 26.6.5+

Exposure · detection

Story timeline

  1. 2026-11-12ScreenConnect: commands pushed through Run Command to at least 288 managed endpoints at 48 Huntress customers within 90 minutes on 2026-11-11 installed a rogue second client and the SCKit toolkit; Huntress links the activity to the RMM+ extension, whose versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key
    active-threatsScreenConnect SCKit: second wave hits on-prem; disable RMM+, update technician clients to 26.6.5+

Hunting pivots

Affected products
ATT&CK techniques (17 across 9 tactics)

17 techniques observed across 1 entry about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v20.1 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • ExecutionScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell · Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell · Software Deployment Tools
  • PersistenceScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service · Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder
  • Privilege EscalationScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service · Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder
  • StealthObfuscated Files or Information · Obfuscated Files or Information: Compile After Delivery · Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service · System Binary Proxy Execution: Msiexec
  • Defense ImpairmentDisable or Modify Tools
  • Credential AccessSteal Web Session Cookie
  • Lateral MovementSoftware Deployment Tools · Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie · Lateral Tool Transfer
  • Command and ControlIngress Tool Transfer · Remote Access Tools: Remote Desktop Software
  • ImpactService Stop

Execution TA0002

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.001Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell×1

Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution. PowerShell is a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment included in the Windows operating system. PowerShell can also be installed on Linux and macOS. Adversaries can use PowerShell to perform a number of actions, including discovery of information and execution of code. Examples include the <code>Start-Process</code> cmdlet which can be used to run an executable and the <code>Invoke-Command</code> cmdlet which runs a command locally or on a remote computer (though administrator permissions are required to use PowerShell to connect to remote systems).

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.003Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution. The Windows command shell (cmd) is the primary command prompt on Windows systems. The Windows command prompt can be used to control almost any aspect of a system, with various permission levels required for different subsets of commands. The command prompt can be invoked remotely via Remote Services such as SSH.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1072Software Deployment Tools×1

Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Examples of such solutions include: SCCM, HBSS, Altiris, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Intune, Azure Arc, and GCP Deployment Manager.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1543.003Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service×1

Adversaries may create or modify Windows services to repeatedly execute malicious payloads as part of persistence. When Windows boots up, it starts programs or applications called services that perform background system functions. Windows service configuration information, including the file path to the service's executable or recovery programs/commands, is stored in the Windows Registry.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1547.001Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder×1

Adversaries may achieve persistence by adding a program to a startup folder or referencing it with a Registry run key. Adding an entry to the "run keys" in the Registry or startup folder will cause the program referenced to be executed when a user logs in. These programs will be executed under the context of the user and will have the account's associated permissions level.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1543.003Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service×1

Adversaries may create or modify Windows services to repeatedly execute malicious payloads as part of persistence. When Windows boots up, it starts programs or applications called services that perform background system functions. Windows service configuration information, including the file path to the service's executable or recovery programs/commands, is stored in the Windows Registry.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1547.001Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder×1

Adversaries may achieve persistence by adding a program to a startup folder or referencing it with a Registry run key. Adding an entry to the "run keys" in the Registry or startup folder will cause the program referenced to be executed when a user logs in. These programs will be executed under the context of the user and will have the account's associated permissions level.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1027Obfuscated Files or Information×1

Adversaries may attempt to make an executable or file difficult to discover or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit. This is common behavior that can be used across different platforms and the network to evade defenses.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1027.004Obfuscated Files or Information: Compile After Delivery×1

Adversaries may attempt to make payloads difficult to discover and analyze by delivering files to victims as uncompiled code. Text-based source code files may subvert analysis and scrutiny from protections targeting executables/binaries. These payloads will need to be compiled before execution; typically via native utilities such as ilasm.exe, csc.exe, or GCC/MinGW.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1036.004Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service×1

Adversaries may attempt to manipulate the name of a task or service to make it appear legitimate or benign. Tasks/services executed by the Task Scheduler or systemd will typically be given a name and/or description. Windows services will have a service name as well as a display name. Many benign tasks and services exist that have commonly associated names. Adversaries may give tasks or services names that are similar or identical to those of legitimate ones.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1218.007System Binary Proxy Execution: Msiexec×1

Adversaries may abuse msiexec.exe to proxy execution of malicious payloads. Msiexec.exe is the command-line utility for the Windows Installer and is thus commonly associated with executing installation packages (.msi). The Msiexec.exe binary may also be digitally signed by Microsoft.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Defense Impairment TA0112

T1685Disable or Modify Tools×1

Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1539Steal Web Session Cookie×1

An adversary may steal web application or service session cookies and use them to gain access to web applications or Internet services as an authenticated user without needing credentials. Web applications and services often use session cookies as an authentication token after a user has authenticated to a website.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Lateral Movement TA0008

T1072Software Deployment Tools×1

Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Examples of such solutions include: SCCM, HBSS, Altiris, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Intune, Azure Arc, and GCP Deployment Manager.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1550.004Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie×1

Adversaries can use stolen session cookies to authenticate to web applications and services. This technique bypasses some multi-factor authentication protocols since the session is already authenticated.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1570Lateral Tool Transfer×1

Adversaries may transfer tools or other files between systems in a compromised environment. Once brought into the victim environment (i.e., Ingress Tool Transfer) files may then be copied from one system to another to stage adversary tools or other files over the course of an operation.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1105Ingress Tool Transfer×1

Adversaries may transfer tools or other files from an external system into a compromised environment. Tools or files may be copied from an external adversary-controlled system to the victim network through the command and control channel or through alternate protocols such as ftp. Once present, adversaries may also transfer/spread tools between victim devices within a compromised environment (i.e. Lateral Tool Transfer).

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

T1219.002Remote Access Tools: Remote Desktop Software×1

An adversary may use legitimate desktop support software to establish an interactive command and control channel to target systems within networks. Desktop support software provides a graphical interface for remotely controlling another computer, transmitting the display output, keyboard input, and mouse control between devices using various protocols. Desktop support software tools, such as `VNC`, `Team Viewer`, `AnyDesk`, `ScreenConnect`, `LogMein`, `AmmyyAdmin`, and other remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools, are commonly used as legitimate technical support software and may be allowed by application control within a target environment.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Impact TA0040

T1489Service Stop×1

Adversaries may stop or disable services on a system to render those services unavailable to legitimate users. Stopping critical services or processes can inhibit or stop response to an incident or aid in the adversary's overall objectives to cause damage to the environment.

Evidence: 2026-11-12/screenconnect-sckit-toolkit-pushed-to-hundreds-of-endpoints · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about ScreenConnect: commands pushed through Run Command to at least 288 managed endpoints at 48 Huntress customers within 90 minutes on 2026-11-1 (1)

2026-11-12 · view entry permalink →

HIGHCVE-2026-127063updatedNATOB1

ScreenConnect: commands pushed through Run Command to at least 288 managed endpoints at 48 Huntress customers within 90 minutes on 2026-11-11 installed a rogue second client and the SCKit toolkit; Huntress links the activity to the RMM+ extension, whose versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key

On 2026-11-11 Huntress observed an operator using access to several cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels to run commands as SYSTEM on groups of managed endpoints through the Run Command feature, hitting at least 288 hosts at 48 organisations within 90 minutes (Huntress, 2026-11-11). Each host installed an attacker-controlled second client and fetched SCKit, a 16-file toolkit delivered encrypted that sets the legitimate client to manual start so the attacker's copy replaces it and runs a per-host executable from a scheduled task (Huntress, 2026-11-11). A second wave on 2026-11-13 hit 205 hosts at 41 organisations with no follow-on executions observed (Huntress, 2026-11-13), and Blackpoint says it appears to target on-premises instances where mitigations are still pending (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Huntress's later update says the activity seems related to RMM+, a third-party extension that bypasses ScreenConnect's accounts, roles and MFA: versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key when an administrator had never set one (Huntress, 2026-11-11). ConnectWise, as CNA, published CVE-2026-127063 (CVSS 4.0 9.3) saying the extension uses a static API secret by default; it names no fixed version, removed the extension from cloud-hosted instances and tells on-premises customers to disable it and not reinstall it (ConnectWise, 2026-11-12).

Microsoft describes the technician stage: RelayTrap, a replacement client compiled on the endpoint with the .NET C# compiler and designed to deliver a payload to the technician who connects, and browser-access code that searches Chrome, Edge and Opera profiles for cookies named .ASPXAUTH, with a component designed to queue payloads through the console's Shared Toolbox (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). ConnectWise says clients 26.6.5 and later block the transfer, and Microsoft adds that a cloud-console update does not update technician clients (Microsoft, 2026-11-13); Huntress and Blackpoint saw no successful technician compromise (Huntress, 2026-11-11; Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

On November 11, 2026, Huntress observed an operator using access to multiple cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels to push commands to groups of managed endpoints.

The legitimate installation of ScreenConnect is then stopped, set to manual start, and the attacker controlled copy of ScreenConnect positioned to replace it.

Huntress 2026-11-11

Disabling these 3rd party extensions is a precautionary containment measure. It does not establish that unauthorized software, persistence mechanisms, or access already present on affected devices has been removed

BleepingComputer (quoting the ConnectWise advisory)

versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 contained a serious authentication flaw

Huntress 2026-11-11

The third-party RMM+ extension for ConnectWise ScreenConnect uses a static API secret by default.

No fixed RMM+ version has been announced. Disabling the extension is the current mitigation.

ConnectWise (CNA disclosure CVE-2026-127063) 2026-11-12

ConnectWise states that ScreenConnect client 26.6.5 and later block the toolkit’s attempted endpoint-to-technician transfer technique.

Removing an unauthorized client alone does not remove the toolkit’s persistence or invalidate exposed web sessions.

Microsoft Threat Intelligence 2026-11-13
Updaterun 2026-11-13T0256Z-intelheadlinesummarytagscvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

ConnectWise, as CNA, published CVE-2026-127063 (CVSS 4.0 9.3) on 2026-11-12: the third-party RMM+ extension "uses a static API secret by default", no fixed version has been announced, disabling is the mitigation, and ConnectWise has removed the extension from cloud-hosted instances while on-premises customers must disable it and not reinstall it (ConnectWise, 2026-11-12). This differs from Huntress's account of a blank key in versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32, and a Huntress spokesperson told The Record that it has seen no evidence of a new vulnerability and that how the attacker got panel access is still unclear, while ConnectWise says the extension's API is protected by a passphrase the partner sets (The Record, 2026-11-12). Blackpoint reverse engineered the toolkit, saw unauthorised deployments through legitimate cloud-hosted instances but no successful propagation to a technician workstation, and calls the extensions' role in the first panel access unresolved (Blackpoint, 2026-11-12).

Updaterun 2026-11-14T0255Z-intelheadlinesummarytechniquessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Microsoft published on 2026-11-13 its analysis of SCKit, which includes RelayTrap, a malicious replacement for the ScreenConnect client on an affected customer endpoint that is designed to deliver a payload to a technician's workstation when they connect for support (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). A watcher on the endpoint enumerates the ScreenConnect client services and builds RelayTrap for each with the .NET C# compiler, and the toolkit's browser code searches Chrome, Edge, Opera and Opera GX profiles for cookies named .ASPXAUTH; a console-distribution component is designed to combine the cookie with the anti-forgery and access tokens, upload a payload, queue it through the Shared Toolbox and remove the uploaded item afterwards (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). Microsoft relays ConnectWise's statement that clients 26.6.5 and later block the transfer; in its own words the fix for CVE-2026-84869 was released on 2026-09-08 and a cloud-console update does not automatically update technician clients, and it advises live response or another out-of-band method instead of ScreenConnect on a suspected device, with connecting technician workstations in scope, invalidation of ScreenConnect web and identity-provider sessions, and no use of a cleanup script recovered from the kit (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). Blackpoint's own test found that a current Host client did not fetch or run the queued transfer, and it found no technical link between the extensions and RelayTrap or the browser routines (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Huntress's update of 2026-11-13 reports a second spike at 16:12 UTC that hit 205 hosts at 41 organisations with no follow-on executions observed, one incident at an organisation running a self-hosted RMM+, a rogue client persisting as a service called Windows Update Agent, and ConnectWise's updated advisory urging partners to verify that every technician client runs 26.6.5 or later (Huntress, 2026-11-13). Blackpoint's update says the second wave appears to target on-premises instances where mitigations remain pending (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Builds on: ConnectWise patches a ScreenConnect flaw Huntress had already watched turn every infected…

threat12 Nov 04:07Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Threats1

Source distribution

  • blackpointcyber.com1 (12%)
  • bleepingcomputer.com1 (12%)
  • euvdservices.enisa.europa.eu1 (12%)
  • github.com1 (12%)
  • huntress.com1 (12%)
  • microsoft.com1 (12%)
  • sophos.com1 (12%)
  • therecord.media1 (12%)