ctipilot.ch

Windows shortcut working-directory resolution flaw abused for remote WebDAV execution

cve · CVE-2025-33053

Coverage timeline
1
first 2026-07-26 → last 2026-07-26
Peak priority
notable
1 notable
Sources cited
2
2 hosts
Sections touched
1
research
Co-occurring entities
0
no co-occurrence
ATT&CK techniques
4
pinned v19.1 · see below

Hunting pivots

Affected products
Microsoft Windows

ATT&CK techniques

4 techniques observed across 1 entry — derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.1 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

Execution TA0002

T1204.002User Execution: Malicious File×1

An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution. Users may be subjected to social engineering to get them to open a file that will lead to code execution. This user action will typically be observed as follow-on behavior from Spearphishing Attachment. Adversaries may use several types of files that require a user to execute them, including .doc, .pdf, .xls, .rtf, .scr, .exe, .lnk, .pif, .cpl, .reg, and .iso.

Evidence: 2026-07-26/rapid7-exposed-webdav-delivery-lab-cve-2025-33053-clickfix · ATT&CK page ↗

T1204.004User Execution: Malicious Copy and Paste×1

An adversary may rely upon a user copying and pasting code in order to gain execution. Users may be subjected to social engineering to get them to copy and paste code directly into a Command and Scripting Interpreter. One such strategy is "ClickFix," in which adversaries present users with seemingly helpful solutions—such as prompts to fix errors or complete CAPTCHAs—that instead instruct the user to copy and paste malicious code.

Evidence: 2026-07-26/rapid7-exposed-webdav-delivery-lab-cve-2025-33053-clickfix · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1218.011System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32×1

Adversaries may abuse rundll32.exe to proxy execution of malicious code. Using rundll32.exe, vice executing directly (i.e. Shared Modules), may avoid triggering security tools that may not monitor execution of the rundll32.exe process because of allowlists or false positives from normal operations. Rundll32.exe is commonly associated with executing DLL payloads (ex: <code>rundll32.exe {DLLname, DLLfunction}</code>).

Evidence: 2026-07-26/rapid7-exposed-webdav-delivery-lab-cve-2025-33053-clickfix · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1105Ingress Tool Transfer×1

Adversaries may transfer tools or other files from an external system into a compromised environment. Tools or files may be copied from an external adversary-controlled system to the victim network through the command and control channel or through alternate protocols such as ftp. Once present, adversaries may also transfer/spread tools between victim devices within a compromised environment (i.e. Lateral Tool Transfer).

Evidence: 2026-07-26/rapid7-exposed-webdav-delivery-lab-cve-2025-33053-clickfix · ATT&CK page ↗

Story timeline

  1. 2026-07-26An exposed WebDAV delivery lab shows industrialised .url/.lnk lure testing against CVE-2025-33053, with LLM-written tooling and ClickFix pages
    research1,048 artifacts on an exposed staging server show how a delivery operator now QA-tests lures like a product team

Where this entity is cited

  • research1

Source distribution

  • rapid7.com1 (50%)
  • thehackernews.com1 (50%)

explore in graph

Entries about Windows shortcut working-directory resolution flaw abused for remote WebDAV execution (1)

2026-07-26 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLECVE-2025-33053exploitedNATOB1

An exposed WebDAV delivery lab shows industrialised .url/.lnk lure testing against CVE-2025-33053, with LLM-written tooling and ClickFix pages

Rapid7's managed-detection practice started from one alert — WebDAV-sourced execution via rundll32 — and pivoted to the operator's staging infrastructure, which was exposed to the internet. "It was functioning as a fully operational malware delivery lab", holding over a thousand artifacts arranged the way an engineering team arranges a test suite: 453 shortcut-based delivery launchers, 236 filename-spoofing tests, 146 tests of execution through trusted Windows tooling, 89 encrypted droppers, ClickFix pages impersonating Cloudflare, Adobe and Discord, and internal operator documentation (Rapid7, 2026-07-20). Rapid7's characterisation of the working method is the finding — "the attacker used LLMs to operate more like a modern software product team" — a line The Hacker News quotes in its own coverage (The Hacker News, 2026-07-20). The specifics behind it — generated README documentation, and bulk-produced lure variants on invoice and salary-statement themes rather than hand-crafted one-offs — are Rapid7's (Rapid7, 2026-07-20).

The technique under test is CVE-2025-33053, a flaw in how Windows resolves the working directory of a shortcut file: a legitimate, signed binary invoked through the shortcut resolves a companion file from the attacker-controlled remote WebDAV path rather than the local filesystem, so the attacker's code executes under the trusted binary's identity. The delivery side pairs WebDAV over HTTP and HTTPS with search-ms: URIs, which render a remote share as a familiar local search-results window, to invoke remote .scr executables disguised as documents. The operator's own embedded notes on the technique read "NO SmartScreen, NO MoTW warnings!" (Rapid7, 2026-07-20) — the claim being that content fetched this way never acquires the Mark-of-the-Web that would otherwise trigger the reputation and protected-view prompts users are trained on. One theme was already live rather than in testing: a national-ID-themed phishing campaign recorded 2,384 launches of a disguised .scr file delivering PureRAT to victims in Mexico.

Triage: WebDAV mounts and rundll32 executions both occur legitimately, so neither alone is the signal. The discriminating pattern is a Windows binary executing with its working directory resolved to a remote UNC or WebDAV path, particularly when the immediate parent is a shortcut invocation from a mail or browser download directory, and when the process subsequently makes outbound connections to the same remote host it loaded from. In process telemetry, correlate the remote working directory with the trusted-binary image path — an administrative script legitimately run from a file share will normally come from an internal, known server, and the discriminator is an external destination combined with a user-initiated document-open lineage.

the attacker used LLMs to operate more like a modern software product team

Rapid7 2026-07-20

NO SmartScreen, NO MoTW warnings!

Rapid7, quoting the operator's own embedded documentation
research26 Jul 14:05Zmulti-sourceOpen finding ↗