ctipilot.ch

Apex2

tool · tool:apex2-botnet single-source

Golang-based IoT/Linux/Windows DDoS botnet, a structural evolution of the earlier Apex botnet, delivered via Telnet credential brute-force; supports a Cloudflare-bypass HTTP(S) flood ('cf'), UDP/game/Discord floods, and TLS floods; Linux builds cover arm/arm64/mipsle/ppc64 (Nozomi Networks Labs, 2026-07-06).

Aliases: Apex

Coverage timeline
5
first 2026-05-18 → last 2026-07-09
Peak priority
critical
1 critical · 3 high · 1 notable
Sources cited
11
11 hosts
Sections touched
4
active-threats, trending-vulnerabilities, weekly-annual-reports
Co-occurring entities
3
see Related entities below
ATT&CK techniques
8
pinned v19.2 · see below
2026-05-185 appearances2026-07-09

ATT&CK techniques

8 techniques observed across 3 entries — derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.2 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

Initial Access TA0001

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×1

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Evidence: 2026-05-22/cve-2026-20223-cisco-secure-workload-cvss-10-0-zero-auth-res · ATT&CK page ↗

Execution TA0002

T1574Hijack Execution Flow×1

Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the way operating systems run programs. Hijacking execution flow can be for the purposes of persistence, since this hijacked execution may reoccur over time. Adversaries may also use these mechanisms to elevate privileges or evade defenses, such as application control or other restrictions on execution.

Evidence: 2026-05-22/cve-2026-34926-trend-micro-apex-one-on-premise-post-auth-dir · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1543.002Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service×1

Adversaries may create or modify systemd services to repeatedly execute malicious payloads as part of persistence. Systemd is a system and service manager commonly used for managing background daemon processes (also known as services) and other system resources. Systemd is the default initialization (init) system on many Linux distributions replacing legacy init systems, including SysVinit and Upstart, while remaining backwards compatible.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1543.002Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service×1

Adversaries may create or modify systemd services to repeatedly execute malicious payloads as part of persistence. Systemd is a system and service manager commonly used for managing background daemon processes (also known as services) and other system resources. Systemd is the default initialization (init) system on many Linux distributions replacing legacy init systems, including SysVinit and Upstart, while remaining backwards compatible.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

T1548.003Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Sudo and Sudo Caching×1

Adversaries may perform sudo caching and/or use the sudoers file to elevate privileges. Adversaries may do this to execute commands as other users or spawn processes with higher privileges.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1036.005Masquerading: Match Legitimate Resource Name or Location×1

Adversaries may match or approximate the name or location of legitimate files, Registry keys, or other resources when naming/placing them. This is done for the sake of evading defenses and observation.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

T1574Hijack Execution Flow×1

Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the way operating systems run programs. Hijacking execution flow can be for the purposes of persistence, since this hijacked execution may reoccur over time. Adversaries may also use these mechanisms to elevate privileges or evade defenses, such as application control or other restrictions on execution.

Evidence: 2026-05-22/cve-2026-34926-trend-micro-apex-one-on-premise-post-auth-dir · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1110Brute Force×1

Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained. Without knowledge of the password for an account or set of accounts, an adversary may systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism. Brute forcing passwords can take place via interaction with a service that will check the validity of those credentials or offline against previously acquired credential data, such as password hashes.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1105Ingress Tool Transfer×1

Adversaries may transfer tools or other files from an external system into a compromised environment. Tools or files may be copied from an external adversary-controlled system to the victim network through the command and control channel or through alternate protocols such as ftp. Once present, adversaries may also transfer/spread tools between victim devices within a compromised environment (i.e. Lateral Tool Transfer).

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

Impact TA0040

T1498Network Denial of Service×1

Adversaries may perform Network Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of targeted resources to users. Network DoS can be performed by exhausting the network bandwidth services rely on. Example resources include specific websites, email services, DNS, and web-based applications. Adversaries have been observed conducting network DoS attacks for political purposes and to support other malicious activities, including distraction, hacktivism, and extortion.

Evidence: 2026-07-09/nozomi-apex2-c2c-meow-golang-iot-linux-ddos-botnets · ATT&CK page ↗

Story timeline

  1. 2026-07-09Nozomi documents two new Golang IoT/Linux DDoS botnets (Apex2, c2c/meow) built for speed and reuse over sophistication
    active-threatsTwo Golang DDoS botnets, Apex2 and c2c/meow, flood exposed Telnet/SSH Linux and IoT with fake-systemd persistence and passwordless-sudo escalation
  2. 2026-05-22CVE-2026-34926 — Trend Micro Apex One On-Premise: post-auth directory traversal by admin-credential holder injects code deployed fleet-wide to all managed agents (CISA KEV, ITW)
    trending-vulnerabilitiesCVE-2026-34926 — Trend Micro Apex One On-Premise: post-auth directory traversal by admin-credential holder injects code deployed fleet-wide to all managed
  3. 2026-05-22CVE-2026-20223 — Cisco Secure Workload: CVSS 10.0 zero-auth REST API grants Site Admin privileges across all tenants, no workaround
    trending-vulnerabilities
  4. 2026-05-18Verizon 2026 DBIR — vulnerability exploitation is the #1 breach vector for the first time in 19 years; patching cadence regressed
    weekly-annual-reports
  5. 2026-05-18Two CISA KEV additions under active exploitation — Trend Micro Apex One and Langflow
    weekly-top-stories

Where this entity is cited

  • trending-vulnerabilities2
  • weekly-top-stories1
  • weekly-annual-reports1
  • active-threats1

Source distribution

  • cisa.gov1 (9%)
  • helpnetsecurity.com1 (9%)
  • industrialcyber.co1 (9%)
  • jpcert.or.jp1 (9%)
  • nozominetworks.com1 (9%)
  • sec.cloudapps.cisco.com1 (9%)
  • security-hub.ncsc.admin.ch1 (9%)
  • securityweek.com1 (9%)
  • other3 (27%)

Co-occurring entities

Derived — referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

All cited sources (11)

Entries about Apex2 (5)

2026-07-09 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLENATOB2

Nozomi documents two new Golang IoT/Linux DDoS botnets (Apex2, c2c/meow) built for speed and reuse over sophistication

Nozomi Networks Labs' AI-assisted honeypot triage flagged two Golang-based DDoS botnet samples this spring that stand out from the routine volume of Mirai-derived variants: Apex2 and c2c (distributed under the filename "meow") (Nozomi Networks Labs, 2026-07-06). Apex2 is a direct structural evolution of the earlier Apex botnet: infection begins with Telnet connections and credential brute-forcing, followed by download-and-execute of the Golang payload, which registers with its C2 over a plaintext protocol (host OS/architecture) and ships builds for Linux (arm, arm64, mipsle, ppc64) and Windows (386, amd64). Its named flood commands include cf (an HTTP(S) flood specifically tuned to bypass Cloudflare via randomized User-Agent lists and long keep-alive timeouts), udp/pps, discord/game UDP floods, and three TLS-flood variants (tls, tlsplus, tlsplusbypass). c2c/meow is architecturally simpler — a Golang flooder with no built-in propagation (a separate SSH scanner handles brute-forcing and delivery) that authenticates to a hardcoded C2 over plaintext JSON-over-TCP, checks for passwordless sudo (sudo -n true) to self-escalate, then persists by copying itself to /usr/local/bin/cpufreqd and registering a fake systemd unit masquerading as a "CPU Frequency Daemon" — supporting ten flood-module types (icmp, dnsudp, udp, http, directhttp, fasthttp, betterhttp, tcp, tcphandshake, dnstcp).

Nozomi's stated point for defenders is that neither family is sophisticated — both lean on commodity Golang tooling, weak/default credentials and exposed Telnet/SSH interfaces rather than novel exploitation — and that the lack of sophistication does not reduce the risk at scale, because the build-and-deploy cycle for such botnets is getting faster. ATT&CK mapping: T1110 Brute Force (Telnet/SSH), T1105 Ingress Tool Transfer, T1548.003 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Sudo (c2c's passwordless-sudo self-escalation), T1543.002 Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service with T1036.005 Masquerading (the fake cpufreqd unit), and T1498 Network Denial of Service for the flood modules.

It checks whether passwordless sudo is available by running sudo -n true and evaluating the return value. If successful, it relaunches itself with increased privileges, copies to /usr/local/bin/cpufreqd, and creates a fake systemd service named "CPU Frequency Daemon"

In both cases, the emphasis is not on sophistication, but on speed, reuse and scalability.

Nozomi Networks Labs 2026-07-06
threat09 Jul 12:33Zsingle-sourceOpen finding ↗

2026-05-22 · view entry permalink →

CVE-2026-20223 — Cisco Secure Workload: CVSS 10.0 zero-auth REST API grants Site Admin privileges across all tenants, no workaround

CVE-2026-20223 (CVSS 10.0, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) is an access validation failure in the internal REST API of Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration), the enterprise micro-segmentation platform (Cisco PSIRT, 2026-05-20). An unauthenticated remote attacker sends a single crafted HTTP request to an internal API endpoint to be granted Site Admin-level privileges — enabling cross-tenant data read, configuration modification, and full visibility over workload segmentation policy across all tenant boundaries. Both SaaS-hosted and on-premises deployments are affected; Cisco silently patched SaaS. On-premises operators must upgrade: 4.0.x → 4.0.3.17; 3.10.x → 3.10.8.3; 3.9 and earlier must migrate (no fix available). No workaround exists. Cisco found no evidence of exploitation at disclosure (2026-05-20); the vulnerability was discovered internally. NCSC-CH flagged this on 2026-05-21. The attack surface is the internal REST API management plane — restrict untrusted network access to the Secure Workload cluster API as the primary compensating control until patching is complete. Technique: T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application. This is distinct from CVE-2026-20182 (Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN) covered on 2026-05-20.

CVE Summary Table

CVE Product CVSS EPSS KEV Exploited Patch Source
CVE-2026-34926 Trend Micro Apex One On-Premise 6.7 n/a Yes (2026-05-21) Yes (ITW) Build 17079 Trend Micro
CVE-2025-34291 Langflow AI Platform 9.4 (v4) / 8.8 (v3) n/a Yes (2026-05-21) Yes (ITW since Jan 2026) >= 1.7.0 / 1.9.3 CISA KEV
CVE-2026-20223 Cisco Secure Workload 10.0 n/a No No (disclosed internally) 3.10.8.3 / 4.0.3.17 Cisco PSIRT
vulnerability22 May 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding ↗

2026-05-22 · view entry permalink →

CRITICALCVE-2026-34926exploited

CVE-2026-34926 — Trend Micro Apex One On-Premise: post-auth directory traversal by admin-credential holder injects code deployed fleet-wide to all managed agents (CISA KEV, ITW)

CVE-2026-34926 (CVSS 6.7, CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal) affects Apex One On-Premise server and agent builds below 17079. An authenticated attacker who has already obtained administrative credentials to the Apex One management server traverses the directory structure to modify a key table, injecting malicious code that the management server then distributes to all enrolled agent endpoints via the product's built-in update mechanism — one compromised management console results in fleet-wide code execution on every managed endpoint. The exploitation prerequisite (admin credentials to the Apex One server) does not reduce urgency: CISA added CVE-2026-34926 to KEV on 2026-05-21 following confirmed ITW exploitation, and management server admin accounts are a high-value target for credential theft campaigns. JPCERT/CC confirmed exploitation in the wild on 2026-05-22; CISA added CVE-2026-34926 to KEV on 2026-05-21. Fixed: server and agent build 17079 per Trend Micro KA-0023430. The Apex One as a Service (SaaS) variant is not affected. Until patched, restrict local-network access to the Apex One management console to a dedicated management VLAN; treat the console host as Tier-0 infrastructure given its fleet-wide code distribution capability. Technique: T1574 Hijack Execution Flow via trusted software update path.

Trend Micro Incorporated has reported that attacks exploiting the relative path traversal vulnerability in TrendAI Apex One(On Premise) (CVE-2026-34926) have been observed in the wild.

JPCERT/CC

a potential attacker must have access to the Apex One Server and already obtained administrative credentials to the server via some other method to exploit this vulnerability.

HKCERT
vulnerability22 May 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding ↗

Earlier coverage (2)