CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

Veeam Backup & Replication

product · product:veeam-backup-replication single-sourcesingle-source-national-cert

Coverage
3
first 2026-09-21 → last 2026-11-04
Latest activity
2026-11-04
Bitdefender: a 3AM affiliate joined a school estate's AD domains with new trusts after stealing Veeam…
Peak priority
notable
3 notable
Targets
education
sectors: education, public-sector · regions: uk, europe
Sources cited
10
7 hosts

Action items (1)

Do-now tasks recorded on the entries about Veeam Backup & Replication, newest first. Check the date before acting on an older one.

  • Upgrade every Veeam Backup & Replication 13.x server and Veeam Software Appliance to 13.1.2 (build 13.1.2.57) or 13.0.3 (build 13.0.3.63), Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 to 8.6 Patch 1 (build 8.6.0.5011) and Veeam ONE 13.1 to Patch 1 (build 13.1.0.7940), because Veeam names no workaround and warns that attackers reverse-engineer its patches.
    2026-10-29CVE-2026-108142 +5

Defender insights

What each entry about Veeam Backup & Replication tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-11-04NOTABLEBitdefender: a 3AM affiliate joined a school estate's AD domains with new trusts after stealing Veeam credentials

Exposure · detection

2026-10-29NOTABLEVeeam fixes an unauthenticated 9.1 authorization bypass on 13.x servers, a VB365 SQL injection and a ONE MFA bypass

Exposure · detection

2026-10-21NOTABLEexploitedJoint advisory on SafePay: VPN credentials and five old edge and backup flaws in, backup NAS wiped before encryption

Exposure · triage · detection

Story timeline

  1. 2026-11-043AM ransomware affiliate in a UK school estate: Bitdefender documents backup-credential theft, rogue domain admins and new two-way trusts between Active Directory domains, with a command-retry pattern it reads as a model-driven loop
    active-threatsBitdefender: a 3AM affiliate joined a school estate's AD domains with new trusts after stealing Veeam credentials
  2. 2026-10-29CVE-2026-108142, Veeam Backup & Replication: an unauthenticated authorization bypass on the CDP Coordinator Service of 13.x backup servers (CVSS 4.0 9.1), fixed in 13.1.2 and 13.0.3, with a Backup for Microsoft 365 SQL injection to code execution and a Veeam ONE MFA bypass fixed the same day
    trending-vulnerabilitiesVeeam fixes an unauthenticated 9.1 authorization bypass on 13.x servers, a VB365 SQL injection and a ONE MFA bypass
  3. 2026-10-21AA26-293A: FBI, CISA and German and UK law enforcement describe SafePay ransomware, which enters through VPN credentials and five edge-device and backup-server flaws and factory-resets backup NAS devices before encrypting
    active-threatsJoint advisory on SafePay: VPN credentials and five old edge and backup flaws in, backup NAS wiped before encryption
ATT&CK techniques (39 across 13 tactics)

39 techniques observed across 3 entries about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v20.0 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • Initial AccessValid Accounts · External Remote Services · Exploit Public-Facing Application
  • ExecutionWindows Management Instrumentation · Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell · Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell · System Services: Service Execution
  • PersistenceScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Valid Accounts · Account Manipulation · Modify Registry · External Remote Services · Create Account · Create Account: Domain Account · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • Privilege EscalationScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task · Exploitation for Privilege Escalation · Valid Accounts · Account Manipulation · Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft · Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification · Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control
  • StealthObfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing · Masquerading · Indicator Removal: File Deletion · Valid Accounts · Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft · System Binary Proxy Execution
  • Defense ImpairmentModify Registry · Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication · Disable or Modify Tools
  • Credential AccessOS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory · Brute Force · Credentials from Password Stores · Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • DiscoveryAccount Discovery · Domain Trust Discovery
  • Lateral MovementRemote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol · Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares · Remote Services: Windows Remote Management
  • CollectionData Staged · Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility
  • Command and ControlRemote Access Tools
  • ExfiltrationExfiltration Over C2 Channel · Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol · Exfiltration Over Web Service
  • ImpactData Encrypted for Impact · Inhibit System Recovery

Initial Access TA0001

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1133External Remote Services×1

Adversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network. Remote services such as VPNs, Citrix, and other access mechanisms allow users to connect to internal enterprise network resources from external locations. There are often remote service gateways that manage connections and credential authentication for these services. Services such as Windows Remote Management and VNC can also be used externally.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×2

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Evidence: 2026-10-29/veeam-cve-2026-108142-cdp-coordinator-authorization-bypass · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Execution TA0002

T1047Windows Management Instrumentation×1

Adversaries may abuse Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to execute malicious commands and payloads. WMI is designed for programmers and is the infrastructure for management data and operations on Windows systems. WMI is an administration feature that provides a uniform environment to access Windows system components.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.001Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell×2

Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution. PowerShell is a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment included in the Windows operating system. PowerShell can also be installed on Linux and macOS. Adversaries can use PowerShell to perform a number of actions, including discovery of information and execution of code. Examples include the <code>Start-Process</code> cmdlet which can be used to run an executable and the <code>Invoke-Command</code> cmdlet which runs a command locally or on a remote computer (though administrator permissions are required to use PowerShell to connect to remote systems).

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1059.003Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution. The Windows command shell (cmd) is the primary command prompt on Windows systems. The Windows command prompt can be used to control almost any aspect of a system, with various permission levels required for different subsets of commands. The command prompt can be invoked remotely via Remote Services such as SSH.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1569.002System Services: Service Execution×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows service control manager to execute malicious commands or payloads. The Windows service control manager (<code>services.exe</code>) is an interface to manage and manipulate services. The service control manager is accessible to users via GUI components as well as system utilities such as <code>sc.exe</code> and Net.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098Account Manipulation×1

Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups. These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1112Modify Registry×1

Adversaries may interact with the Windows Registry as part of a variety of other techniques to aid in defense evasion, persistence, and execution.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1133External Remote Services×1

Adversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network. Remote services such as VPNs, Citrix, and other access mechanisms allow users to connect to internal enterprise network resources from external locations. There are often remote service gateways that manage connections and credential authentication for these services. Services such as Windows Remote Management and VNC can also be used externally.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1136Create Account×1

Adversaries may create an account to maintain access to victim systems. With a sufficient level of access, creating such accounts may be used to establish secondary credentialed access that do not require persistent remote access tools to be deployed on the system.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1136.002Create Account: Domain Account×1

Adversaries may create a domain account to maintain access to victim systems. Domain accounts are those managed by Active Directory Domain Services where access and permissions are configured across systems and services that are part of that domain. Domain accounts can cover user, administrator, and service accounts. With a sufficient level of access, the <code>net user /add /domain</code> command can be used to create a domain account.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-10-29/veeam-cve-2026-108142-cdp-coordinator-authorization-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1053.005Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task×1

Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The schtasks utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel. In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation×1

Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Security constructs such as permission levels will often hinder access to information and use of certain techniques, so adversaries will likely need to perform privilege escalation to include use of software exploitation to circumvent those restrictions.

Evidence: 2026-10-29/veeam-cve-2026-108142-cdp-coordinator-authorization-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098Account Manipulation×1

Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups. These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1134.001Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft×1

Adversaries may duplicate then impersonate another user's existing token to escalate privileges and bypass access controls. For example, an adversary can duplicate an existing token using `DuplicateToken` or `DuplicateTokenEx`. The token can then be used with `ImpersonateLoggedOnUser` to allow the calling thread to impersonate a logged on user's security context, or with `SetThreadToken` to assign the impersonated token to a thread.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1484.002Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification×1

Adversaries may add new domain trusts, modify the properties of existing domain trusts, or otherwise change the configuration of trust relationships between domains and tenants to evade defenses and/or elevate privileges.Trust details, such as whether or not user identities are federated, allow authentication and authorization properties to apply between domains or tenants for the purpose of accessing shared resources. These trust objects may include accounts, credentials, and other authentication material applied to servers, tokens, and domains.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1548.002Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control×1

Adversaries may bypass UAC mechanisms to elevate process privileges on system. Windows User Account Control (UAC) allows a program to elevate its privileges (tracked as integrity levels ranging from low to high) to perform a task under administrator-level permissions, possibly by prompting the user for confirmation. The impact to the user ranges from denying the operation under high enforcement to allowing the user to perform the action if they are in the local administrators group and click through the prompt or allowing them to enter an administrator password to complete the action.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1027.002Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing×1

Adversaries may perform software packing or virtual machine software protection to conceal their code. Software packing is a method of compressing or encrypting an executable. Packing an executable changes the file signature in an attempt to avoid signature-based detection. Most decompression techniques decompress the executable code in memory. Virtual machine software protection translates an executable's original code into a special format that only a special virtual machine can run. A virtual machine is then called to run this code.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1036Masquerading×1

Adversaries may attempt to manipulate features of their artifacts to make them appear legitimate or benign to users and/or security tools. Masquerading occurs when the name or location of an object, legitimate or malicious, is manipulated or abused for the sake of evading defenses and observation. This may include manipulating file metadata, tricking users into misidentifying the file type, and giving legitimate task or service names.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1070.004Indicator Removal: File Deletion×1

Adversaries may delete files left behind by the actions of their intrusion activity. Malware, tools, or other non-native files dropped or created on a system by an adversary (ex: Ingress Tool Transfer) may leave traces to indicate to what was done within a network and how. Removal of these files can occur during an intrusion, or as part of a post-intrusion process to minimize the adversary's footprint.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1134.001Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft×1

Adversaries may duplicate then impersonate another user's existing token to escalate privileges and bypass access controls. For example, an adversary can duplicate an existing token using `DuplicateToken` or `DuplicateTokenEx`. The token can then be used with `ImpersonateLoggedOnUser` to allow the calling thread to impersonate a logged on user's security context, or with `SetThreadToken` to assign the impersonated token to a thread.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1218System Binary Proxy Execution×1

Adversaries may bypass process and/or signature-based defenses by proxying execution of malicious content with signed, or otherwise trusted, binaries. Binaries used in this technique are often Microsoft-signed files, indicating that they have been either downloaded from Microsoft or are already native in the operating system. Binaries signed with trusted digital certificates can typically execute on Windows systems protected by digital signature validation. Several Microsoft signed binaries that are default on Windows installations can be used to proxy execution of other files or commands.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Defense Impairment TA0112

T1112Modify Registry×1

Adversaries may interact with the Windows Registry as part of a variety of other techniques to aid in defense evasion, persistence, and execution.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1484.002Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification×1

Adversaries may add new domain trusts, modify the properties of existing domain trusts, or otherwise change the configuration of trust relationships between domains and tenants to evade defenses and/or elevate privileges.Trust details, such as whether or not user identities are federated, allow authentication and authorization properties to apply between domains or tenants for the purpose of accessing shared resources. These trust objects may include accounts, credentials, and other authentication material applied to servers, tokens, and domains.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-10-29/veeam-cve-2026-108142-cdp-coordinator-authorization-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

T1685Disable or Modify Tools×2

Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1003.001OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory×1

Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS). After a user logs on, the system generates and stores a variety of credential materials in LSASS process memory. These credential materials can be harvested by an administrative user or SYSTEM and used to conduct Lateral Movement using Use Alternate Authentication Material.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1110Brute Force×1

Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained. Without knowledge of the password for an account or set of accounts, an adversary may systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism. Brute forcing passwords can take place via interaction with a service that will check the validity of those credentials or offline against previously acquired credential data, such as password hashes.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1555Credentials from Password Stores×1

Adversaries may search for common password storage locations to obtain user credentials. Passwords are stored in several places on a system, depending on the operating system or application holding the credentials. There are also specific applications and services that store passwords to make them easier for users to manage and maintain, such as password managers and cloud secrets vaults. Once credentials are obtained, they can be used to perform lateral movement and access restricted information.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1555.003Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers×1

Adversaries may acquire credentials from web browsers by reading files specific to the target browser. Web browsers commonly save credentials such as website usernames and passwords so that they do not need to be entered manually in the future. Web browsers typically store the credentials in an encrypted format within a credential store; however, methods exist to extract plaintext credentials from web browsers.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-10-29/veeam-cve-2026-108142-cdp-coordinator-authorization-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Discovery TA0007

T1087Account Discovery×1

Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of valid accounts, usernames, or email addresses on a system or within a compromised environment. This information can help adversaries determine which accounts exist, which can aid in follow-on behavior such as brute-forcing, spear-phishing attacks, or account takeovers (e.g., Valid Accounts).

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1482Domain Trust Discovery×1

Adversaries may attempt to gather information on domain trust relationships that may be used to identify lateral movement opportunities in Windows multi-domain/forest environments. Domain trusts provide a mechanism for a domain to allow access to resources based on the authentication procedures of another domain. Domain trusts allow the users of the trusted domain to access resources in the trusting domain. The information discovered may help the adversary conduct SID-History Injection, Pass the Ticket, and Kerberoasting. Domain trusts can be enumerated using the `DSEnumerateDomainTrusts()` Win32 API call, .NET methods, and LDAP. The Windows utility Nltest is known to be used by adversaries to enumerate domain trusts.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

Lateral Movement TA0008

T1021.001Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to log into a computer using the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1021.002Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares×2

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to interact with a remote network share using Server Message Block (SMB). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1021.006Remote Services: Windows Remote Management×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to interact with remote systems using Windows Remote Management (WinRM). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Collection TA0009

T1074Data Staged×1

Adversaries may stage collected data in a central location or directory prior to Exfiltration. Data may be kept in separate files or combined into one file through techniques such as Archive Collected Data. Interactive command shells may be used, and common functionality within cmd and bash may be used to copy data into a staging location.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1560.001Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility×1

Adversaries may use utilities to compress and/or encrypt collected data prior to exfiltration. Many utilities include functionalities to compress, encrypt, or otherwise package data into a format that is easier/more secure to transport.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1219Remote Access Tools×1

An adversary may use legitimate remote access tools to establish an interactive command and control channel within a network. Remote access tools create a session between two trusted hosts through a graphical interface, a command line interaction, a protocol tunnel via development or management software, or hardware-level access such as KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) over IP solutions. Desktop support software (usually graphical interface) and remote management software (typically command line interface) allow a user to control a computer remotely as if they are a local user inheriting the user or software permissions. This software is commonly used for troubleshooting, software installation, and system management. Adversaries may similarly abuse response features included in EDR and other defensive tools that enable remote access.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel×1

Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an existing command and control channel. Stolen data is encoded into the normal communications channel using the same protocol as command and control communications.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · ATT&CK page ↗

T1048Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol×1

Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over a different protocol than that of the existing command and control channel. The data may also be sent to an alternate network location from the main command and control server.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1567Exfiltration Over Web Service×1

Adversaries may use an existing, legitimate external Web service to exfiltrate data rather than their primary command and control channel. Popular Web services acting as an exfiltration mechanism may give a significant amount of cover due to the likelihood that hosts within a network are already communicating with them prior to compromise. Firewall rules may also already exist to permit traffic to these services.

Evidence: 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Impact TA0040

T1486Data Encrypted for Impact×2

Adversaries may encrypt data on target systems or on large numbers of systems in a network to interrupt availability to system and network resources. They can attempt to render stored data inaccessible by encrypting files or data on local and remote drives and withholding access to a decryption key. This may be done in order to extract monetary compensation from a victim in exchange for decryption or a decryption key (ransomware) or to render data permanently inaccessible in cases where the key is not saved or transmitted.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

T1490Inhibit System Recovery×2

Adversaries may delete or remove built-in data and turn off services designed to aid in the recovery of a corrupted system to prevent recovery. This may deny access to available backups and recovery options.

Evidence: 2026-11-04/threeam-uk-school-veeam-rogue-domain-admins-new-ad-trusts · 2026-10-21/aa26-293a-safepay-ransomware-edge-flaws-backup-nas-reset · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about Veeam Backup & Replication (3)

2026-11-04 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLENATOB2

3AM ransomware affiliate in a UK school estate: Bitdefender documents backup-credential theft, rogue domain admins and new two-way trusts between Active Directory domains, with a command-retry pattern it reads as a model-driven loop

Bitdefender MDR attributes the intrusion to a 3AM (ThreeAM) ransomware affiliate on the encryptor build and its command-line pattern; the target was a school estate in the UK whose domains began as separate Active Directory environments, and initial access is unknown (Bitdefender, 2026-11-03). In September 2026 the attacker first took credentials from the backup software: a modified copy of a public script read the credentials stored in Veeam's databases on three backup servers and decrypted them with the Windows Data Protection API, and a browser credential database was copied from a terminal server (Bitdefender, 2026-11-03). It then worked with built-in tools (PowerShell, WMI, reg, netsh, rundll32) and a few public ones (an Impacket-like remote-execution tool that returns output over administrative shares, Mimikatz renamed to look like a monitoring binary), enumerated domain trusts from a domain controller, searched SYSVOL logon scripts for the names and subnets of other schools, created two backdoor domain-administrator accounts, joined three separate domains with two-way trusts within about three hours, tried to remove EDR agents, which anti-tampering controls blocked, deleted system-state backups and encrypted machines with a Rust-based encryptor (Bitdefender, 2026-11-03).

Bitdefender's reading, which it calls interpretation and not a finding, is that a model drove part of the work: commands call the Veeam web interface on a port and with a login method that do not match the vendor documentation, output is self-labelled, scripts carry numbered revisions, and retries arrive 40 to 101 seconds apart whatever the size of the change, while a new task takes minutes. Every attacker action Bitdefender saw came from an unmanaged internal host with no agent, so the automation itself was never seen, and Bitdefender says it could not document anything about a language model (Bitdefender, 2026-11-03).

a new trust between domains is a rare change and cheap to alert on.

We were not able to access the machine the attacker worked from, so we cannot document anything about the language model itself

Bitdefender
incident04 Nov 03:55Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →

2026-10-29 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLECVE-2026-108142 +5NATOA2

CVE-2026-108142, Veeam Backup & Replication: an unauthenticated authorization bypass on the CDP Coordinator Service of 13.x backup servers (CVSS 4.0 9.1), fixed in 13.1.2 and 13.0.3, with a Backup for Microsoft 365 SQL injection to code execution and a Veeam ONE MFA bypass fixed the same day

Veeam published three advisories on 2026-10-27. In Backup & Replication, CVE-2026-108142 (CVSS 4.0 9.1, critical) lets an unauthenticated attacker bypass authorization on the CDP Coordinator Service of Windows-based Backup & Replication and of the Veeam Software Appliance; it affects 13.1.1.18 and all earlier 13.1 builds and 13.0.2.29 and all earlier 13.0 builds, is fixed in 13.1.2 (build 13.1.2.57) and 13.0.3 (build 13.0.3.63), and does not affect 12.x (Veeam KB4948, 2026-10-27). The same advisory fixes two medium path-traversal flaws that need the Restore Operator role plus control over the contents of a backed-up NAS share and that write attacker-controlled files to an arbitrary path on the backup server, and a local privilege escalation in Veeam Agent for Linux version 13.1.1.4 and earlier that applies only to agents managed by a Backup & Replication server (Veeam KB4948, 2026-10-27). Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 8.5.0.1014 and earlier carry CVE-2026-106076 (9.0, critical): an authenticated organization-transfer peer injects SQL into the source server's configuration database, which gives cross-tenant read and write of configuration data and remote code execution as the PostgreSQL service account; the fix is 8.6 (build 8.6.0.1102), as it is for CVE-2026-106077 (8.3), which lets a user with the Backup for Microsoft 365 Administrator role read arbitrary files on the backup server as LocalSystem; two further flaws, an unauthenticated REST API authentication bypass with a forged federation token (6.9) and an installer file-write (4.3), need 8.6 Patch 1 (build 8.6.0.5011) (Veeam KB4957, 2026-10-27). Veeam ONE 13.1.0.7233 and earlier let an attacker with valid Administrator credentials disable multi-factor authentication globally before completing MFA verification (8.5, high; fixed in 13.1 P1, build 13.1.0.7940) (Veeam KB4951, 2026-10-27).

NCSC Switzerland relayed the Backup & Replication and Veeam ONE advisories on 2026-10-28, lists the exploitation status as unknown with the vendor reporting no evidence of active exploitation, and gives the prerequisite for the critical flaw as network access to the backup server's CDP Coordinator Service (NCSC Switzerland, 2026-10-28). heise adds that backup servers are a favourite target of ransomware groups (translated from German) (heise online, 2026-10-28), and Veeam itself says attackers will likely try to reverse-engineer a disclosed patch to exploit unpatched deployments (Veeam KB4948, 2026-10-27).

A vulnerability allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authorization on the CDP Coordinator Service.

Note: Older versions (e.g., 12.x) are not affected.

Veeam (KB4948) 2026-10-27

leading to cross-tenant read and write of configuration data and remote code execution as the PostgreSQL service account.

Veeam (KB4957) 2026-10-27

A vulnerability allowing an attacker with valid Administrator credentials to bypass multi-factor authentication by disabling it globally before completing MFA verification.

Veeam (KB4951) 2026-10-27

UNKNOWN (the vendor reports no evidence of active exploitation)

NCSC Switzerland 2026-10-28

attackers will likely attempt to reverse-engineer the patch to exploit unpatched deployments of Veeam software.

Veeam (KB4948) 2026-10-27
vulnerability29 Oct 04:41Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →

2026-10-21 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLECVE-2020-3259 +4exploitedNATOA2

AA26-293A: FBI, CISA and German and UK law enforcement describe SafePay ransomware, which enters through VPN credentials and five edge-device and backup-server flaws and factory-resets backup NAS devices before encrypting

CISA, the FBI, the US Secret Service, Germany's Landeskriminalamt Rheinland-Pfalz and UK law enforcement published advisory AA26-293A on 2026-10-20, drawing on investigations as recently as August 2026; they say SafePay has affected businesses and critical infrastructure in North America, South America, Europe and Australia since August 2024, was among the most active ransomware groups in 2026 and has impacted at least 600 separate victims (CISA et al., 2026-10-20). Initial access is exposed credentials, brute force password attacks and VPN access, with the actors using Mullvad VPN addresses and phished account profiles to reach victim networks and exploit CVE-2020-3259 and CVE-2023-20269 on edge devices, and automated scripts exploiting CVE-2023-27532, CVE-2024-40711 and CVE-2024-40766 on internet-exposed systems (CISA et al., 2026-10-20). CISA's catalog names them as Cisco ASA and Firepower Threat Defense (the first two), Veeam Backup & Replication (the next two) and SonicWall SonicOS flaws (CISA KEV catalog, 2026-10-20).

Once inside, the actors take administrative rights on existing accounts or create new ones, run commands remotely with PsExec and WinRM, enumerate network shares with ShareFinder.ps1 and SharpShares.exe, disable security software, bypass User Account Control, then move over RDP and remote-management tools (CISA et al., 2026-10-20). They compress data with 7-Zip or WinRAR and exfiltrate it with WinSCP, RClone, FileZilla or OneDrive, and sometimes install AnyDesk or TeamViewer (CISA et al., 2026-10-20). Before encrypting they halt the Volume Shadow Copy Service and reset network-attached storage that holds backup data to factory settings; encryption then appends .SafePay (CISA et al., 2026-10-20).

Triage: 7-Zip, WinRAR, RClone, FileZilla, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, PsExec and WinRM are everyday administrative tools, and the advisory warns against calling them malicious without evidence of actor use (CISA et al., 2026-10-20); a shadow-copy service stop or a factory reset of backup storage that follows them is the discriminating step.

The SafePay threat actors have impacted at least 600 separate victims from multiple critical infrastructure sectors.

SafePay ransomware was among the most active ransomware groups in 2026.

SafePay threat actors halt the Volume Shadow Copy Service and reset Network Attached Storage containing victim backup data to initial factory settings to inhibit system recovery attempts

CISA, FBI, USSS, LKA Rheinland-Pfalz, UK NCA (AA26-293A) 2026-10-20

Builds on: Inside IT: SafePay published about 30 GB from Manno, social-assistance files with AHV numbers… · SonicWall CVE-2024-40766: why patched firewalls keep falling to Akira and Fog

threat21 Oct 03:42Zsingle-source · national CERTOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Threats2
  • Vulns1

Source distribution

  • veeam.com3 (30%)
  • cisa.gov2 (20%)
  • businessinsights.bitdefender.com1 (10%)
  • heise.de1 (10%)
  • psirt.global.sonicwall.com1 (10%)
  • sec.cloudapps.cisco.com1 (10%)
  • security-hub.ncsc.admin.ch1 (10%)
All cited sources (10)