CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

GLPI

product · product:glpi single-source

Coverage
2
first 2026-07-23 → last 2026-10-11
Latest activity
2026-09-21
Cisco Talos maps The Gentlemen's AD attack chain, including offline credential theft from a mounted VHDX…
Peak priority
notable
2 notable
Targets
public-sector
sectors: public-sector, healthcare, education · regions: europe
Sources cited
5
5 hosts

Action items (1)

Do-now tasks recorded on the entries about GLPI, newest first. Check the date before acting on an older one.

  • Update internet-facing GLPI instances to 11.0.8 (11.0.x) or 10.0.26 (10.0.x) now, the release fixes a critical form-import RCE and a complete MFA bypass that together defeat the authentication hardening the 11.x branch specifically introduced.
    2026-07-23CVE-2026-48482 +9

Defender insights

What each entry about GLPI tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-09-21NOTABLECisco Talos maps The Gentlemen's AD attack chain, including offline credential theft from a mounted VHDX backup image

Triage

2026-07-23NOTABLEGLPI patches a critical form-import RCE and a full MFA bypass in the ITSM/asset platform widely run by EU public-sector, education and healthcare

Triage

Story timeline

  1. 2026-09-21The Gentlemen's open-directory attack toolchain: mounting a victim's own VHDX backup files to pull ntds.dit and SAM offline, then chunked-rclone exfil to Wasabi
    active-threatsCisco Talos maps The Gentlemen's AD attack chain, including offline credential theft from a mounted VHDX backup image
  2. 2026-07-23GLPI 11.0.8 / 10.0.26, critical RCE via form import and complete MFA bypass in the public-sector ITSM platform
    trending-vulnerabilitiesGLPI patches a critical form-import RCE and a full MFA bypass in the ITSM/asset platform widely run by EU public-sector, education and healthcare
ATT&CK techniques (19 across 11 tactics)

19 techniques observed across 2 entries about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v20.0 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • ReconnaissanceActive Scanning
  • Initial AccessExploit Public-Facing Application
  • PersistenceModify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • Privilege EscalationExploitation for Privilege Escalation
  • Defense ImpairmentModify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • Credential AccessOS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager · OS Credential Dumping: NTDS · Brute Force · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication · Adversary-in-the-Middle: Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay
  • DiscoveryRemote System Discovery · Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups · Account Discovery: Domain Account · Domain Trust Discovery
  • Lateral MovementRemote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol · Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares · Remote Services: Windows Remote Management · Exploitation of Remote Services
  • CollectionData from Network Shared Drive · Adversary-in-the-Middle: Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay
  • Command and ControlProtocol Tunneling
  • ExfiltrationExfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage

Reconnaissance TA0043

T1595Active Scanning×1

Adversaries may execute active reconnaissance scans to gather information that can be used during targeting. Active scans are those where the adversary probes victim infrastructure via network traffic, as opposed to other forms of reconnaissance that do not involve direct interaction.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Initial Access TA0001

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application×2

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation×1

Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Security constructs such as permission levels will often hinder access to information and use of certain techniques, so adversaries will likely need to perform privilege escalation to include use of software exploitation to circumvent those restrictions.

Evidence: 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Defense Impairment TA0112

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1003.002OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager×1

Adversaries may attempt to extract credential material from the Security Account Manager (SAM) database either through in-memory techniques or through the Windows Registry where the SAM database is stored. The SAM is a database file that contains local accounts for the host, typically those found with the <code>net user</code> command. Enumerating the SAM database requires SYSTEM level access.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1003.003OS Credential Dumping: NTDS×1

Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights. By default, the NTDS file (NTDS.dit) is located in <code>%SystemRoot%\NTDS\Ntds.dit</code> of a domain controller.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1110Brute Force×1

Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained. Without knowledge of the password for an account or set of accounts, an adversary may systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism. Brute forcing passwords can take place via interaction with a service that will check the validity of those credentials or offline against previously acquired credential data, such as password hashes.

Evidence: 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-07-23/glpi-11-0-8-10-0-26-critical-rce-mfa-bypass · ATT&CK page ↗

T1557.001Adversary-in-the-Middle: Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay×1

By responding to LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS network traffic, adversaries may spoof an authoritative source for name resolution to force communication with an adversary controlled system. This activity may be used to collect or relay authentication materials.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Discovery TA0007

T1018Remote System Discovery×1

Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of other systems by IP address, hostname, or other logical identifier on a network that may be used for Lateral Movement from the current system. Functionality could exist within remote access tools to enable this, but utilities available on the operating system could also be used such as Ping, <code>net view</code> using Net, or, on ESXi servers, `esxcli network diag ping`.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1069.002Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups×1

Adversaries may attempt to find domain-level groups and permission settings. The knowledge of domain-level permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as domain administrators.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1087.002Account Discovery: Domain Account×1

Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of domain accounts. This information can help adversaries determine which domain accounts exist to aid in follow-on behavior such as targeting specific accounts which possess particular privileges.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1482Domain Trust Discovery×1

Adversaries may attempt to gather information on domain trust relationships that may be used to identify lateral movement opportunities in Windows multi-domain/forest environments. Domain trusts provide a mechanism for a domain to allow access to resources based on the authentication procedures of another domain. Domain trusts allow the users of the trusted domain to access resources in the trusting domain. The information discovered may help the adversary conduct SID-History Injection, Pass the Ticket, and Kerberoasting. Domain trusts can be enumerated using the `DSEnumerateDomainTrusts()` Win32 API call, .NET methods, and LDAP. The Windows utility Nltest is known to be used by adversaries to enumerate domain trusts.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Lateral Movement TA0008

T1021.001Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to log into a computer using the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1021.002Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to interact with a remote network share using Server Message Block (SMB). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1021.006Remote Services: Windows Remote Management×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to interact with remote systems using Windows Remote Management (WinRM). The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1210Exploitation of Remote Services×1

Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. A common goal for post-compromise exploitation of remote services is for lateral movement to enable access to a remote system.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Collection TA0009

T1039Data from Network Shared Drive×1

Adversaries may search network shares on computers they have compromised to find files of interest. Sensitive data can be collected from remote systems via shared network drives (host shared directory, network file server, etc.) that are accessible from the current system prior to Exfiltration. Interactive command shells may be in use, and common functionality within cmd may be used to gather information.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

T1557.001Adversary-in-the-Middle: Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay×1

By responding to LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS network traffic, adversaries may spoof an authoritative source for name resolution to force communication with an adversary controlled system. This activity may be used to collect or relay authentication materials.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Command and Control TA0011

T1572Protocol Tunneling×1

Adversaries may tunnel network communications to and from a victim system within a separate protocol to avoid detection/network filtering and/or enable access to otherwise unreachable systems. Tunneling involves explicitly encapsulating a protocol within another. This behavior may conceal malicious traffic by blending in with existing traffic and/or provide an outer layer of encryption (similar to a VPN). Tunneling could also enable routing of network packets that would otherwise not reach their intended destination, such as SMB, RDP, or other traffic that would be filtered by network appliances or not routed over the Internet.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1567.002Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage×1

Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a cloud storage service rather than over their primary command and control channel. Cloud storage services allow for the storage, edit, and retrieval of data from a remote cloud storage server over the Internet.

Evidence: 2026-09-21/the-gentlemen-open-directory-vhdx-backup-ntds-theft · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about GLPI (2)

2026-09-21 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLECVE-2025-24799updatedNATOB2

The Gentlemen's open-directory attack toolchain: mounting a victim's own VHDX backup files to pull ntds.dit and SAM offline, then chunked-rclone exfil to Wasabi

Cisco Talos recovered an exposed open directory believed to belong to an operator associated with the ransomware-as-a-service brand The Gentlemen, and reconstructed a six-phase attack chain from the directory's own shell command history (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17). The operator first built a pivot platform using VPN software, Chisel and Ligolo, then appears to have used nmap and masscan against externally exposed hosts and internal services once inside, then used NetExec to enumerate SMB shares, host information, LDAP and computer information in Active Directory; Talos assesses the operator may also have used RustHound/BloodHound-related tools (a Rust BloodHound collector) to collect domain users, groups, computers, administrative privileges and trust relationships for attack-path analysis. For initial footholds against public-facing applications, the actor tried to exploit CVE-2025-24799 with a PoC and sqlmap to pull user information from the database (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17), an unauthenticated SQL injection in GLPI's inventory endpoint fixed in GLPI 10.0.18 (GLPI, 2025-03-18), and separately downloaded and ran a cPanel/WHM authentication-bypass PoC. Talos also observed traces suggesting exploitation of CVE-2020-1472 (Zerologon) and the MS17-010 vulnerabilities, alongside NTLM-relay tooling via Responder. Separately, for lateral movement once inside the network, the operator used NetExec and Impacket to attempt authentication against SMB, LDAP, RDP and WinRM across multiple hosts.

The credential-theft step is the chain's most distinctive detail: the operator mounted a backup share over CIFS, installed libguestfs-tools, qemu-utils and nbd-client to inspect the Windows filesystem inside VHDX backup images, copied out ntds.dit, SAM and SYSTEM, and ran Impacket's secretsdump.py offline against the extracted files (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17). Talos found traces indicating that the VHDX backup files themselves, not just the small credential-dump output, were compressed with zstd, split into 256MiB chunks and uploaded concurrently (up to 16 files at a time) to Wasabi cloud storage via rclone, with the operator visibly reconfiguring transfer settings mid-exfiltration to improve speed and reliability. Command and control ran on the open-source AdaptixC2 post-exploitation framework, which Talos says The Gentlemen may be using in real-world attacks, and Russian-language script comments plus Cyrillic-keymap mistyping in the operator's own bash history (whoami, ls, ip a, clear, exit typed on a Russian keyboard layout) indicate to Talos the possibility that a Russian-speaking individual was involved. Talos notes that The Gentlemen is suspected to be led by individuals based in Russia, which it says further supports the connection to the group (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17).

Triage: legitimate backup-verification and disaster-recovery testing also mount VHDX images and inspect their contents, so the mount event alone is not the signal, the discriminator is the source of the session: a host or account with no backup role, or a tunnel endpoint, reading whole VHDX images and followed by bulk outbound transfer.

Talos identified open directory infrastructure believed to have been used by a threat actor associated with The Gentlemen. During our investigation, we observed numerous tools used to support ransomware operations.

In Phase 6, involving information collection and exfiltration, the threat actor mounted a backup share via CIFS at /mnt/Backup and inspected the Windows file system within VHDX backups. The command history records the installation of libguestfs-tools, qemu-utils, and nbd-client, the creation of directories such as /mnt/vhdx, and the copying of ntds.dit, SAM, and SYSTEM. The actor then used Impacket's secretsdump.py to extract credentials and password hashes from the collected ntds.dit and SAM files, saving the results as "ntds.txt" and "SAM.txt".

Cisco Talos 2026-09-17
Correctionrun 2026-09-30T0639Z-auditcvesprioritysourcing_notesourcesbodysummary

Talos describes the actor's use of the GLPI SQL injection CVE-2025-24799 as an attempt, with a PoC and sqlmap to retrieve user information from the database, and reports no outcome (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17), so the flaw is not recorded as exploited. GLPI fixed it in 10.0.18 (GLPI, 2025-03-18). Talos presents the Russian-language traces as indicating the possibility of a Russian-speaking operator, and the group's leadership in Russia as suspected rather than established (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17).

Correctionrun 2026-10-11T1307Z-auditheadlinesummarybody

Talos does not say the operator avoided the live domain controller: it reports traces suggesting exploitation of Zerologon, a live-DC attack, alongside the offline extraction of ntds.dit, SAM and SYSTEM from a CIFS-mounted VHDX backup (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17). The backup path is an additional route to the domain's credentials, not a replacement for one. In the first phase Talos names VPN software, Chisel and Ligolo as the pivot tooling; SSH appears only in the later lateral-movement phase. The commands Talos recovered, the CIFS mount of the backup share and the image tooling among them, ran on the operator's own server, which reached the victim network through tunnels, so the detection guidance now describes what the victim network sees (Cisco Talos, 2026-09-17).

threat21 Sep 04:40Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →

2026-07-23 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLECVE-2026-48482 +9NATOA1

GLPI 11.0.8 / 10.0.26, critical RCE via form import and complete MFA bypass in the public-sector ITSM platform

GLPI 11.0.8 and 10.0.26 shipped on 2026-06-24, fixing 16 vulnerabilities (16 addressed in 11.0.8, 9 in 10.0.26), but the CVEs were publicly disclosed on 2026-07-21 and CERT-FR published its advisory CERTFR-2026-AVI-0909 on 2026-07-22; the in-window event that brings the flaws to defenders' attention (GLPI Project, 2026-06-24; CERT-FR, 2026-07-22). Two flaws are critical: CVE-2026-48482, remote code execution via GLPI 11's native form-import feature; an unsafe parsing/deserialization path in the import handler that gives an attacker who can submit a crafted form file code execution with application privileges; and CVE-2026-52848, a complete bypass of GLPI 11's multi-factor authentication mechanism, defeating the 2FA hardening the 11.x branch specifically introduced (GLPI Project, 2026-06-24). High-severity entries add exploitation depth: account takeover by brute-forcing the 2FA code itself (no rate-limiting on OTP verification, CVE-2026-49470), privilege escalation through the authtype API (CVE-2026-53625), SQL injection in dropdown and history-tab components (CVE-2026-47678, CVE-2026-53629), arbitrary file deletion (CVE-2026-47679) and arbitrary document read (CVE-2026-53626), plus stored and reflected XSS (IT-Connect, 2026-06-25). Affected are GLPI 11.0.x before 11.0.8 and all versions before 10.0.26; no source in this run reports in-the-wild exploitation.

[SECURITY - ==CRITICAL== 11.0] RCE via Form import (CVE-2026-48482)

GLPI Project 2026-06-24

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans GLPI. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

CERT-FR
vulnerability23 Jul 04:34Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Vulns1
  • Threats1

Source distribution

  • blog.talosintelligence.com1 (20%)
  • cert.ssi.gouv.fr1 (20%)
  • github.com1 (20%)
  • glpi-project.org1 (20%)
  • it-connect.tech1 (20%)