ctipilot.ch

Grafana Labs CoinbaseCartel breach

incident · incident:grafana-labs-coinbasecartel-pwn-request-github-actions-breac

Grafana Labs confirms source-code-only theft via a GitHub Actions pwn-request by CoinbaseCartel; no customer data; ransom rejected on FBI guidance.

Coverage timeline
1
first 2026-05-19 → last 2026-05-19
Peak priority
notable
1 notable
Sources cited
4
4 hosts
Sections touched
1
active-threats
Co-occurring entities
3
see Related entities below
ATT&CK techniques
3
pinned v19.1 · see below

ATT&CK techniques

3 techniques observed across 1 entry — derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.1 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

Initial Access TA0001

T1195.002Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain×1

Adversaries may manipulate application software prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise. Supply chain compromise of software can take place in a number of ways, including manipulation of the application source code, manipulation of the update/distribution mechanism for that software, or replacing compiled releases with a modified version.

Evidence: 2026-05-19/grafana-labs-coinbasecartel-breach-victim-confirms-source-co · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1552.004Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys×1

Adversaries may search for private key certificate files on compromised systems for insecurely stored credentials. Private cryptographic keys and certificates are used for authentication, encryption/decryption, and digital signatures. Common key and certificate file extensions include: .key, .pgp, .gpg, .ppk., .p12, .pem, .pfx, .cer, .p7b, .asc.

Evidence: 2026-05-19/grafana-labs-coinbasecartel-breach-victim-confirms-source-co · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1567Exfiltration Over Web Service×1

Adversaries may use an existing, legitimate external Web service to exfiltrate data rather than their primary command and control channel. Popular Web services acting as an exfiltration mechanism may give a significant amount of cover due to the likelihood that hosts within a network are already communicating with them prior to compromise. Firewall rules may also already exist to permit traffic to these services.

Evidence: 2026-05-19/grafana-labs-coinbasecartel-breach-victim-confirms-source-co · ATT&CK page ↗

Story timeline

  1. 2026-05-19Grafana Labs CoinbaseCartel breach — victim confirms source-code-only theft, no customer data, ransom rejected
    active-threats

Where this entity is cited

  • active-threats1

Source distribution

  • bleepingcomputer.com1 (25%)
  • securityweek.com1 (25%)
  • thehackernews.com1 (25%)
  • theregister.com1 (25%)

Co-occurring entities

Derived — referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Entries about Grafana Labs CoinbaseCartel breach (1)

2026-05-19 · view entry permalink →

NOTABLE

Grafana Labs CoinbaseCartel breach — victim confirms source-code-only theft, no customer data, ransom rejected

UPDATE (originally covered 2026-W21): Grafana Labs issued an official 2026-05-18 confirmation of the GitHub Pwn-Request breach previously reported in the 2026-W21 weekly summary (SecurityWeek, 2026-05-18; BleepingComputer, 2026-05-18; The Register, 2026-05-18). The material new disclosures in the 2026-05-18 confirmation: Grafana explicitly states (a) only source code was accessed — "no personal or customer information was stolen"; (b) the incident has not impacted customer systems or operations; (c) the ransom was refused. The technical-mechanism details (pull_request_target workflow misconfiguration, forked-PR injection of a curl command, harvested write-scoped GitHub token, canary-token detection) were previously reported in the 2026-W21 weekly summary citing THN's earlier coverage (The Hacker News, 2026-05-17); they are repeated here as context for defenders who did not catch the weekly. CoinbaseCartel is assessed by THN as an offshoot of the ShinyHunters / Scattered Spider / LAPSUS$ ecosystem and has accumulated ~170 victims since September 2025.

Defender takeaway: Grafana OSS is the de facto monitoring/observability platform in EU/CH public-sector SOC and NOC environments; defenders should monitor non-official Grafana plugin updates and unsigned Grafana agent builds for the next 30 days as a potential supply-chain trojanisation follow-on. The Pwn-Request attack pattern is the same class of CI/CD misconfiguration covered by SentinelOne's Living off the Pipeline taxonomy (referenced 2026-05-16); audit every pull_request_target workflow to ensure no privileged steps run on untrusted-fork code, set permissions: read-all at workflow level and elevate only as needed, and separate privilege-requiring steps into a second workflow_run workflow gated on merged code. MITRE T1195.002 / T1552.004 / T1567.

no personal or customer information was stolen and the incident has not impacted customer systems or operations

Grafana via SecurityWeek

the attackers demanded a ransom to prevent the source code from being leaked, but it has decided not to pay up

SecurityWeek
incident19 May 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding ↗