CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault kill chain

campaign · campaign:storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-cloud-wide-kill-chain

Storm-2949 malware-less Azure kill chain: voice-phishing SSPR reset → Entra ID → M365 Graph → App Service Kudu → Key Vault → SQL → Storage → Azure VM.

Coverage
1
first 2026-05-20 → last 2026-05-20
Latest activity
2026-05-20
Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault Azure kill chain
Peak priority
high
1 high
Targets
public-sector
sectors: public-sector, healthcare, finance · regions: europe
Sources cited
11
3 hosts

Defender insights

What each entry about Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault kill chain tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-05-20HIGHStorm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault Azure kill chain

Detection

Relationships explore in graph

Typed, source-stated connections from the entity registry; each edge cites the entry whose reporting establishes it.

attributed to

Story timeline

  1. 2026-05-20Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault Azure kill chain
    deep-dive

Hunting pivots

Tags
cloudidentityorganized-crimephishing
ATT&CK techniques (15 across 10 tactics)

15 techniques observed across 1 entry about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.2 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • Initial AccessValid Accounts · Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts
  • PersistenceValid Accounts · Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts · Account Manipulation · Account Manipulation: Device Registration · Modify Authentication Process · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • Privilege EscalationValid Accounts · Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts · Account Manipulation · Account Manipulation: Device Registration
  • StealthValid Accounts · Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts
  • Defense ImpairmentModify Authentication Process · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication · Disable or Modify Tools · Disable or Modify System Firewall: Cloud Firewall
  • Credential AccessUnsecured Credentials · Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files · Modify Authentication Process · Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication
  • DiscoveryFile and Directory Discovery
  • Lateral MovementRemote Services · Remote Services: Cloud Services
  • CollectionData from Cloud Storage
  • ExfiltrationExfiltration Over C2 Channel

Initial Access TA0001

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts×1

Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Persistence TA0003

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts×1

Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098Account Manipulation×1

Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups. These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098.005Account Manipulation: Device Registration×1

Adversaries may register a device to an adversary-controlled account. Devices may be registered in a multifactor authentication (MFA) system, which handles authentication to the network, or in a device management system, which handles device access and compliance.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556Modify Authentication Process×1

Adversaries may modify authentication mechanisms and processes to access user credentials or enable otherwise unwarranted access to accounts. The authentication process is handled by mechanisms, such as the Local Security Authentication Server (LSASS) process and the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) on Windows, pluggable authentication modules (PAM) on Unix-based systems, and authorization plugins on MacOS systems, responsible for gathering, storing, and validating credentials. By modifying an authentication process, an adversary may be able to authenticate to a service or system without using Valid Accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Privilege Escalation TA0004

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts×1

Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098Account Manipulation×1

Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups. These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1098.005Account Manipulation: Device Registration×1

Adversaries may register a device to an adversary-controlled account. Devices may be registered in a multifactor authentication (MFA) system, which handles authentication to the network, or in a device management system, which handles device access and compliance.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Stealth TA0005

T1078Valid Accounts×1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts×1

Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Defense Impairment TA0112

T1556Modify Authentication Process×1

Adversaries may modify authentication mechanisms and processes to access user credentials or enable otherwise unwarranted access to accounts. The authentication process is handled by mechanisms, such as the Local Security Authentication Server (LSASS) process and the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) on Windows, pluggable authentication modules (PAM) on Unix-based systems, and authorization plugins on MacOS systems, responsible for gathering, storing, and validating credentials. By modifying an authentication process, an adversary may be able to authenticate to a service or system without using Valid Accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1685Disable or Modify Tools×1

Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1686.001Disable or Modify System Firewall: Cloud Firewall×1

Adversaries may disable or modify a firewall within a cloud environment to bypass controls that limit access to cloud resources.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Credential Access TA0006

T1552Unsecured Credentials×1

Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials. These credentials can be stored and/or misplaced in many locations on a system, including plaintext files (e.g. Shell History), operating system or application-specific repositories (e.g. Credentials in Registry), or other specialized files/artifacts (e.g. Private Keys).

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1552.001Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files×1

Adversaries may search local file systems and remote file shares for files containing insecurely stored credentials. These can be files created by users to store their own credentials, shared credential stores for a group of individuals, configuration files containing passwords for a system or service, or source code/binary files containing embedded passwords.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556Modify Authentication Process×1

Adversaries may modify authentication mechanisms and processes to access user credentials or enable otherwise unwarranted access to accounts. The authentication process is handled by mechanisms, such as the Local Security Authentication Server (LSASS) process and the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) on Windows, pluggable authentication modules (PAM) on Unix-based systems, and authorization plugins on MacOS systems, responsible for gathering, storing, and validating credentials. By modifying an authentication process, an adversary may be able to authenticate to a service or system without using Valid Accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1556.006Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication×1

Adversaries may disable or modify multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanisms to enable persistent access to compromised accounts.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Discovery TA0007

T1083File and Directory Discovery×1

Adversaries may enumerate files and directories or may search in specific locations of a host or network share for certain information within a file system. Adversaries may use the information from File and Directory Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Lateral Movement TA0008

T1021Remote Services×1

Adversaries may use Valid Accounts to log into a service that accepts remote connections, such as telnet, SSH, and VNC. The adversary may then perform actions as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

T1021.007Remote Services: Cloud Services×1

Adversaries may log into accessible cloud services within a compromised environment using Valid Accounts that are synchronized with or federated to on-premises user identities. The adversary may then perform management actions or access cloud-hosted resources as the logged-on user.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Collection TA0009

T1530Data from Cloud Storage×1

Adversaries may access data from cloud storage.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Exfiltration TA0010

T1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel×1

Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an existing command and control channel. Stolen data is encoded into the normal communications channel using the same protocol as command and control communications.

Evidence: 2026-05-20/storm-2949-sspr-to-key-vault-azure-kill-chain · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault kill chain (1)

2026-05-20 · view entry permalink →

HIGH

Storm-2949 SSPR-to-Key-Vault Azure kill chain

Microsoft Threat Intelligence published the full Storm-2949 incident analysis on 2026-05-18, with BleepingComputer corroboration on 2026-05-19. The actor is financially motivated, currently unattributed to a nation-state nexus, and the engagement notable for what it does not contain: no traditional malware, no exploits, no zero-days, only end-to-end abuse of legitimate Azure / M365 management features. The incident is operationally relevant to every Swiss / EU organisation running production workloads on commercial Azure or Azure Government, which now spans much of federal admin, cantonal IT, healthcare, finance, telco, and education.

Background. SSPR (Self-Service Password Reset) social-engineering as an initial-access vector has been documented in passing by several vendors since 2024, the technique typically pairs a legitimate SSPR initiation by the attacker with a phone call posing as IT support, getting the victim to approve an MFA prompt the attacker triggered. What Microsoft's 2026-05-18 write-up adds is the post-identity cloud kill chain: the same engagement walks from SSPR abuse through Entra ID, Microsoft Graph reconnaissance, OneDrive / SharePoint exfiltration, App Service Kudu console pivoting, Key Vault secret theft, SQL firewall mutation, Storage SAS-token theft, and finally on to Azure VM credential harvesting and on-prem reconnaissance, a single chain crossing five Azure resource providers without dropping a binary.

Phase 1, Identity (SSPR + voice phishing). Storm-2949 initiated the Microsoft SSPR flow for selected target users (IT personnel and senior leadership), then contacted those users posing as internal IT support to walk them through approving the resulting MFA prompts. With four accounts compromised, the actor: reset passwords, removed existing MFA methods (phone, email, Authenticator registrations), enrolled Microsoft Authenticator on attacker-controlled devices, and locked the legitimate users out. Maps to T1078.004 (Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts), T1556.006 (Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication), and T1098.005 (Account Manipulation: Device Registration). Microsoft notes: "Storm-2949 leveraged a social engineering technique consistent with known abuses of Microsoft's Self-Service Password Reset (SSPR) process. In such attacks, a threat actor initiates the SSPR process on behalf of a targeted user and subsequently employs social engineering tactics to persuade the user to complete multifactor authentication (MFA) prompts that appear to be legitimate."

Phase 2 (M365 discovery and exfiltration. With four hijacked identities, the actor authenticated to Microsoft Graph from custom Python tooling, enumerated users, roles, applications, and service principals across the tenant, and exfiltrated thousands of files from OneDrive and SharePoint) selecting VPN configuration documents and remote-access procedures as a lateral-movement springboard. Maps to T1530 (Data from Cloud Storage) and T1083 (File and Directory Discovery) via Graph.

Phase 3, Azure App Service to Key Vault pivot. Using a privileged custom Azure RBAC role accessible to one of the compromised principals, Storm-2949 invoked microsoft.Web/sites/publishxml/action on secondary App Service instances, auxiliary apps hosting internal authentication and API surfaces, extracting basic-auth FTP / Web Deploy credentials. From there the actor accessed the Kudu management console of those App Services (which expose a shell and file-system inside the App Service container). They then pivoted to Azure Key Vault using the Owner role (which one of the compromised user's Azure RBAC permissions granted over a specific Key Vault), modified access policies to grant themselves vault data-plane permissions, and exfiltrated dozens of secrets, database credentials, connection strings, third-party API keys. Microsoft: "The threat actor pivoted to the organization's Azure Key Vault estate, an environment more likely to centralize sensitive secrets and offer indirect access to production systems." Maps to T1552.001 (Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files) and T1021.007 (Remote Services: Cloud Services).

Phase 4 (Azure SQL and Storage. The actor mutated SQL firewall rules via microsoft.sql/servers/firewallrules/write to open access from attacker IPs, queried databases over those rules, then deleted the rules to remove the artefact) defence evasion via the cloud control plane. In parallel, Storage account network ACLs were mutated via microsoft.storage/storageaccounts/write to allow attacker IPs, SAS tokens and account keys were retrieved via microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/listkeys/action, and large-blob downloads were executed over multiple days using a custom Python script against the Azure Storage SDK. Maps to T1562.007 (Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall), T1530 (Data from Cloud Storage), and T1041 (Exfiltration Over C2 Channel).

Phase 5, Azure VM compromise. Storm-2949 deployed the VMAccess Azure VM extension to create new local admin accounts on selected VMs and used Azure Run Command to execute payloads for in-VM credential harvesting and on-prem Active Directory reconnaissance via the VM's network presence. Maps to T1078.004 (cloud-managed admin via VMAccess) and T1021.007 (Run Command as cloud remote-services execution).

Detection concepts. The kill chain crosses identity, App Service, Key Vault, SQL, Storage, and VM extensions; endpoint-only coverage will miss the entire chain. The detection layers that matter are cloud-side:

  • Entra ID Sign-In + Audit Logs. Hunt for SSPR flow initiations (category: SelfServicePasswordReset) followed within the same session by MFA-method removal, new Authenticator-device enrollment, and sign-in from a new IP / device. Alert on rapid Graph-API user / role / app enumeration (hundreds of users, applications, servicePrincipals reads in a short window).
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud. Alerts on Key Vault access-policy modifications, SQL firewall-rule mutations, Storage account network-access-rule changes, App Service publishxml extraction, and VM extension deployments. Each is individually noisy; the time-correlation is the signal.
  • Azure Audit Log (Activity Log). Hunt for the sequence Add-AzKeyVaultCertificate / microsoft.keyvault/vaults/accessPolicies/write → microsoft.sql/servers/firewallrules/write → microsoft.storage/storageaccounts/write → microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/listkeys/action from the same principal within a short window.
  • App Service / Kudu access logs. Unusual SCM (Source Control Manager) authentication events from non-developer IPs and unexpected Kudu shell-command issuance.

Hardening / mitigation.

  • Require phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2 / certificate-based) for all privileged roles: admin roles, Key Vault Contributor, Storage Account Contributor, SQL Server Contributor, App Service Contributor. SSPR-via-Authenticator-prompt is a number-matching MFA path; phishing-resistant binds eliminate it.
  • Restrict SSPR to pre-registered recovery methods only. Conditional Access policies that block SSPR registration of new methods without an interactive sign-in from a compliant device close the device-enrollment hijack pattern.
  • Constrain Owner and Key Vault Contributor role assignments: both grant management-plane modification of access policies. Microsoft notes Storm-2949 exercised the Owner role over a specific Key Vault to mutate access policies and grant itself data-plane access; Key Vault Contributor confers the same management-plane mutation capability. Where Key Vault data access is needed, use the data-plane RBAC model (Key Vault Secrets User / Reader) rather than management-plane Owner / Contributor.
  • Enable Defender for Cloud across Key Vault, App Service, Storage, and SQL: Storm-2949's chain triggers built-in alerts at every step; absent the per-service Defender plans, those events sink into the Activity Log without alerting.
  • Audit custom Azure RBAC roles specifically for microsoft.Web/sites/publishxml/action, microsoft.sql/servers/firewallrules/write, microsoft.storage/storageaccounts/write, microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/extensions/write, and microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/runCommand/action; these are the cloud-control-plane verbs the kill chain depends on.

Why this matters for Swiss / EU public-sector defenders. Storm-2949 specifically targeted IT personnel and senior leadership, the audience-of-one pattern most likely to clear MFA prompts under social-engineering pressure. The kill chain is generic Azure / M365 abuse; nothing in it is tenant-specific. Any Swiss federal, cantonal, healthcare, or finance organisation running Azure has the resource types Storm-2949 walked through. The mitigations are also generic: phishing-resistant MFA on privileged roles, SSPR Conditional Access, Defender-for-Cloud enablement on the four affected services. None of those require breaking changes; they're configuration work, primarily.

threat20 May 05:00Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →
Sources: Microsoft Threat Intelligence, Storm-2949, 2026-05-18 · BleepingComputer, 2026-05-19

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Deep dive1

Source distribution

  • attack.mitre.org9 (82%)
  • bleepingcomputer.com1 (9%)
  • microsoft.com1 (9%)
All cited sources (11)