CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →
‹Thu · 12 Nov 2026›
All daily briefs →
Daily brief · UTC day

Thursday, 12 November 2026

6 verified findings from 1 run · 8 updates to prior coverage · the settled record for this UTC day, in the classic brief order.

Criticality
Kind
Topic
Region
TL;DR · the day in one read
  1. 01ScreenConnect SCKit: second wave hits on-prem; disable RMM+, update technician clients to 26.6.5+. Huntress saw an operator use access to several cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels on 2026-11-11 to run Run Command as SYSTEM on groups of managed endpoints, installing an attacker-controlled second ScreenConnect client and the SCKit toolkit on at least 288 hosts at 48 organisations within 90 minutes; Sophos independently saw the same client deployments. Huntress later said the activity seems related to the third-party RMM+ extension, whose versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key; ConnectWise's CNA record CVE-2026-127063 (CVSS 4.0 9.3) says the extension uses a static API secret by default, names no fix and gives disabling as the mitigation, while a Huntress spokesperson says the panel-access vector is still unclear and Blackpoint calls the extensions' role unresolved. A second wave on 2026-11-13 hit 205 hosts at 41 organisations (Huntress) and appears to target on-premises instances with mitigations pending (Blackpoint); Microsoft describes a rogue client built to deliver a payload to the technician who connects, which ConnectWise says ScreenConnect clients 26.6.5 and later block. →
  2. 02Plone anonymous RCE chain: update or install the 20261110 hotfix, block portal_modifier, check modifier conditions. The Plone and Zope security team released fixes on 2026-11-10 for a chain of issues that together let an anonymous visitor run code on the server in Plone 6.0, 6.1 and 6.2 and, per the team, back to at least 4.3; the entry point is a CMFEditions flaw rated 9.8 with no privileges required, and its advisory says a working proof of concept exists. The team's fixes are the updated packages or the hotfix package Products.PloneHotfix20261110, a workaround that blocks URLs containing portal_modifier has applied since the 2026-11-02 pre-announcement, CVE ids are requested and no source reports exploitation. →
  3. 03Apache httpd mod_http2 RCE: update to 2.4.71 or drop h2/h2c from Protocols; Debian, Ubuntu, Alpine fixed. The Apache HTTP Server project released 2.4.71 on 2026-11-11 to fix CVE-2026-119618, a race in mod_http2 that it rates critical and says can lead to remote code execution in versions 2.4.55 through 2.4.70; Red Hat adds that it is unauthenticated, affects only servers with HTTP/2 enabled through the Protocols directive, and that public research has demonstrated a reliable exploit, while no source reports exploitation. Red Hat has fixed RHEL 9 and 10, Debian bookworm and trixie and Alpine ship 2.4.71 packages, Ubuntu has shipped backported fixes, while a researcher's public test reproduces crashes on 2.4.70 and, per Wordfence, does not show code execution. →

01Active threats, incidents & disclosures4 items

NOTABLENATOA2

Belgium's CCB warns that attackers abused Microsoft Entra ID SMS first-factor sign-in (phone number and one-time code, no password) to compromise several Belgian organisations; turning off 'Use for sign-in' is the priority step

The Belgian Centre for Cybersecurity (CCB) warned on 2026-11-10 that a trusted partner had observed successful attacks against multiple Belgian organisations in which attackers abused Microsoft Entra ID SMS as a first factor, the sign-in mode in which a phone number and a one-time code replace the password (CCB, 2026-11-10). The warning gives no victim count, sector, actor, date range or attack chain, and it does not say how the codes were obtained; its only statement on the factor itself is that SMS and voice can be phished, intercepted or SIM-swapped (CCB, 2026-11-10). No other source reports the Belgian attacks. Microsoft describes the method as designed for frontline workers, advises enabling it only for them, and says it is different from SMS as a multifactor method, which needs a username and password (Microsoft Learn, 2026-10-30). Microsoft is disabling first-factor sign-in in tenants with no such traffic in the previous 30 days (Microsoft Learn, 2026-10-30) and retires its own SMS and voice delivery on 2027-02-01 for all users except Global Administrators and external users, who follow on 2027-07-01; a customer-configured telephony provider can keep the methods working (Microsoft Learn, 2026-09-23).

Check which users actually use SMS sign-in, give them an alternative and disable it as soon as possible

Look for successful SMS-based sign-ins, phone number or method changes, unusual locations or devices, and follow-on activity such as mailbox rules or app consents.

Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium (CCB) 2026-11-10

Builds on: Vaud: device-code phishing against Microsoft 365 is running in Romandie; several organisations…

threat12 Nov 04:03Zsingle-source · national CERTOpen finding →
HIGHCVE-2026-127063updatedNATOB1

ScreenConnect: commands pushed through Run Command to at least 288 managed endpoints at 48 Huntress customers within 90 minutes on 2026-11-11 installed a rogue second client and the SCKit toolkit; Huntress links the activity to the RMM+ extension, whose versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key

On 2026-11-11 Huntress observed an operator using access to several cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels to run commands as SYSTEM on groups of managed endpoints through the Run Command feature, hitting at least 288 hosts at 48 organisations within 90 minutes (Huntress, 2026-11-11). Each host installed an attacker-controlled second client and fetched SCKit, a 16-file toolkit delivered encrypted that sets the legitimate client to manual start so the attacker's copy replaces it and runs a per-host executable from a scheduled task (Huntress, 2026-11-11). A second wave on 2026-11-13 hit 205 hosts at 41 organisations with no follow-on executions observed (Huntress, 2026-11-13), and Blackpoint says it appears to target on-premises instances where mitigations are still pending (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Huntress's later update says the activity seems related to RMM+, a third-party extension that bypasses ScreenConnect's accounts, roles and MFA: versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 accepted a blank access key when an administrator had never set one (Huntress, 2026-11-11). ConnectWise, as CNA, published CVE-2026-127063 (CVSS 4.0 9.3) saying the extension uses a static API secret by default; it names no fixed version, removed the extension from cloud-hosted instances and tells on-premises customers to disable it and not reinstall it (ConnectWise, 2026-11-12).

Microsoft describes the technician stage: RelayTrap, a replacement client compiled on the endpoint with the .NET C# compiler and designed to deliver a payload to the technician who connects, and browser-access code that searches Chrome, Edge and Opera profiles for cookies named .ASPXAUTH, with a component designed to queue payloads through the console's Shared Toolbox (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). ConnectWise says clients 26.6.5 and later block the transfer, and Microsoft adds that a cloud-console update does not update technician clients (Microsoft, 2026-11-13); Huntress and Blackpoint saw no successful technician compromise (Huntress, 2026-11-11; Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

On November 11, 2026, Huntress observed an operator using access to multiple cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels to push commands to groups of managed endpoints.

The legitimate installation of ScreenConnect is then stopped, set to manual start, and the attacker controlled copy of ScreenConnect positioned to replace it.

Huntress 2026-11-11

Disabling these 3rd party extensions is a precautionary containment measure. It does not establish that unauthorized software, persistence mechanisms, or access already present on affected devices has been removed

BleepingComputer (quoting the ConnectWise advisory)

versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32 contained a serious authentication flaw

Huntress 2026-11-11

The third-party RMM+ extension for ConnectWise ScreenConnect uses a static API secret by default.

No fixed RMM+ version has been announced. Disabling the extension is the current mitigation.

ConnectWise (CNA disclosure CVE-2026-127063) 2026-11-12

ConnectWise states that ScreenConnect client 26.6.5 and later block the toolkit’s attempted endpoint-to-technician transfer technique.

Removing an unauthorized client alone does not remove the toolkit’s persistence or invalidate exposed web sessions.

Microsoft Threat Intelligence 2026-11-13
Updaterun 2026-11-13T0256Z-intelheadlinesummarytagscvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

ConnectWise, as CNA, published CVE-2026-127063 (CVSS 4.0 9.3) on 2026-11-12: the third-party RMM+ extension "uses a static API secret by default", no fixed version has been announced, disabling is the mitigation, and ConnectWise has removed the extension from cloud-hosted instances while on-premises customers must disable it and not reinstall it (ConnectWise, 2026-11-12). This differs from Huntress's account of a blank key in versions 1.0.31 and 1.0.32, and a Huntress spokesperson told The Record that it has seen no evidence of a new vulnerability and that how the attacker got panel access is still unclear, while ConnectWise says the extension's API is protected by a passphrase the partner sets (The Record, 2026-11-12). Blackpoint reverse engineered the toolkit, saw unauthorised deployments through legitimate cloud-hosted instances but no successful propagation to a technician workstation, and calls the extensions' role in the first panel access unresolved (Blackpoint, 2026-11-12).

Updaterun 2026-11-14T0255Z-intelheadlinesummarytechniquessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Microsoft published on 2026-11-13 its analysis of SCKit, which includes RelayTrap, a malicious replacement for the ScreenConnect client on an affected customer endpoint that is designed to deliver a payload to a technician's workstation when they connect for support (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). A watcher on the endpoint enumerates the ScreenConnect client services and builds RelayTrap for each with the .NET C# compiler, and the toolkit's browser code searches Chrome, Edge, Opera and Opera GX profiles for cookies named .ASPXAUTH; a console-distribution component is designed to combine the cookie with the anti-forgery and access tokens, upload a payload, queue it through the Shared Toolbox and remove the uploaded item afterwards (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). Microsoft relays ConnectWise's statement that clients 26.6.5 and later block the transfer; in its own words the fix for CVE-2026-84869 was released on 2026-09-08 and a cloud-console update does not automatically update technician clients, and it advises live response or another out-of-band method instead of ScreenConnect on a suspected device, with connecting technician workstations in scope, invalidation of ScreenConnect web and identity-provider sessions, and no use of a cleanup script recovered from the kit (Microsoft, 2026-11-13). Blackpoint's own test found that a current Host client did not fetch or run the queued transfer, and it found no technical link between the extensions and RelayTrap or the browser routines (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Huntress's update of 2026-11-13 reports a second spike at 16:12 UTC that hit 205 hosts at 41 organisations with no follow-on executions observed, one incident at an organisation running a self-hosted RMM+, a rogue client persisting as a service called Windows Update Agent, and ConnectWise's updated advisory urging partners to verify that every technician client runs 26.6.5 or later (Huntress, 2026-11-13). Blackpoint's update says the second wave appears to target on-premises instances where mitigations remain pending (Blackpoint, 2026-11-13).

Builds on: ConnectWise patches a ScreenConnect flaw Huntress had already watched turn every infected…

threat12 Nov 04:07Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →
NOTABLENATOB2

GSocket on compromised Linux web servers: Microsoft sees several unrelated actors install the open-source relay client after exploiting an internet-facing web application, so access outlives the patch; no inbound listener, no attacker-hosted infrastructure

Microsoft observed several unrelated threat actors deploy GSocket, an open-source remote access tool, on Linux servers after exploiting an internet-facing web application, and says it kept access after the exploited vulnerabilities were remediated (Microsoft, 2026-11-11). The chain starts with command execution as a child of the web server or application runtime, where curl fetches an installation script that bash runs; the script profiles the host, picks a client matching the architecture, stages it as a hidden, executable file in a writable or memory-backed path such as /dev/shm and opens encrypted outbound command and control through the Global Socket Relay Network (Microsoft, 2026-11-11). The client is then disguised with kernel-thread-like process names (bash exec -a), persisted through cron, systemd units, shell profiles, watchdogs and redundant copies, and the staging files are removed (Microsoft, 2026-11-11). In a few incidents the actors afterwards attempted the Linux kernel flaw CVE-2026-43284, known as Dirty Frag, to reach root; Microsoft gives no success statement and no affected or fixed versions (Microsoft, 2026-11-11).

Both the compromised host and the operator connect outbound to the public relay, so the host needs no inbound listener, inbound firewall rules do not see the traffic and a shared secret, not an address, pairs the endpoints, which lets the operator reconnect later from any compatible client; Microsoft therefore says that blocking an address or domain is unlikely to cut off access, while egress filtering and outbound monitoring can see it (Microsoft, 2026-11-11). Microsoft's telemetry is concentrated on web applications and hosting; education and research and technology and telecommunications were the largest shares of affected organisations, which Microsoft says reflect exposure more likely than deliberate sector selection (Microsoft, 2026-11-11).

Triage: Microsoft notes that the same relay model also serves legitimate remote administration, and says a match must be judged on process ancestry, execution context, persistence changes and related network activity; a client started from a web-service process tree, from a writable or memory-backed path and under a kernel-thread-like name is the pattern it describes (Microsoft, 2026-11-11).

Threat actors used Gsocket to maintain access even after the vulnerabilities used for initial compromise were remediated.

Because GSocket runs independently of the exploited application, patching the vulnerability does not remove the relay client or its persistence.

Microsoft Threat Intelligence 2026-11-11

Builds on: Dirty Frag: two kernel page-cache write flaws give local root; Microsoft saw su escalation that…

threat12 Nov 04:06Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →
NOTABLENATOB2

Falcon: Unit 42 describes a browser-resident command-and-control framework planted in government webmail and web applications, with a script tag in Roundcube at a Middle Eastern foreign ministry and a sideloaded 'PDF Viewer' extension elsewhere; it shares its core with PeckBirdy

Unit 42 describes Falcon C2, also called XG and not the CrowdStrike Falcon sensor, a NodeJS command-and-control framework whose operator-controlled JavaScript implant runs inside the victim's browser, so the endpoint holds no file for it (Unit 42, 2026-11-11). A script tag placed in a trusted site makes each visit request the implant from the Falcon server, which returns a script obfuscated per browser session, and the implant then holds a TLS WebSocket to the server while the tab is open and runs operator JavaScript through eval (Unit 42, 2026-11-11). Unit 42 identified compromised government entities in one Middle Eastern and four Southeast Asian countries between March and May 2026, among them ministries and law enforcement agencies, and names no actor (Unit 42, 2026-11-11).

In April 2026 a script tag inserted into the Roundcube webmail portal of a Middle Eastern ministry of foreign affairs let the operator intercept credentials as users signed in and monitor sessions (39 Roundcube instances in that country, none observed elsewhere; how the tag got in is not stated) (Unit 42, 2026-11-11). In May 2026 a module in a Southeast Asian police web application harvested usernames and then showed a fake Adobe Flash Player update prompt to chosen users, which served the Antino implant that uses Microsoft OneDrive for command and control (Unit 42, 2026-11-11). Against a justice-department entity in another country, a Chrome extension named PDF Viewer, sideloaded in developer mode, checked in every 3 to 4 minutes for over three weeks and exfiltrated plaintext credentials for an internal correspondence system and a screenshot of a document the victim was viewing (Unit 42, 2026-11-11). The Jewelbug campaign also used an extension named PDF Viewer (Symantec, 2026-08-13); Unit 42 lists it only as a further resource.

Unit 42 assesses with high confidence that Falcon and PeckBirdy (Trend's JScript framework used by China-aligned actors since 2023) are variants of one core framework; that is code lineage, not who operates Falcon (Unit 42, 2026-11-11; Trend Micro, 2026-01-26).

Triage: Unit 42's basis for the cookie check is that Baidu Analytics cookies are normal on sites that use that service and anomalous on internal government web applications where it has no reason to appear (Unit 42, 2026-11-11).

We are currently unaware of how an operator is deploying these browser extensions.

We observed a total of 39 Roundcube instances being affected within the target country.

Based on these extensive technical overlaps, we assess with high confidence that Falcon and PeckBirdy represent variants of the same core framework.

Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 2026-11-11

Builds on: A hack-for-hire group hit 15+ government webmail tenants with one script tag, then escaped the… · Talos: Antino's traffic ends only at Microsoft's Graph and login endpoints, so network…

threat12 Nov 04:05Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →
NOTABLENATOA2

Plone security fix of 2026-11-10: a chain of missing security declarations and opened modules lets an anonymous visitor run code on the server in every supported Plone version and back to 4.3; a working proof of concept exists, no CVE ids yet, no exploitation reported

The Plone and Zope security team says the fixes it released on 2026-11-10 close a chain of several issues that together let an anonymous visitor run code on the server, in all supported Plone versions (6.0, 6.1 and 6.2) and in older ones back to at least 4.3 (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10). The anonymous entry point is Products.CMFEditions: the conditional modifiers in portal_modifier had no security declarations, so an anonymous visitor could change a modifier's TALES condition and then run it, and the condition is also evaluated when an editor saves versioned content (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10). Products.CMFPlone, Products.MimetypesRegistry and plone.batching opened whole modules to restricted code, which let TALES expressions and Python scripts escape the sandbox and reach modules such as os, and plone.restapi opened the json module (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10). The CMFEditions advisory rates its flaw 9.8 with no privileges required and states that a working proof of concept exists; the team says details are public and that with current AI tools it may not take long to turn them into a working exploit, and no source reports exploitation (Plone, 2026-11-10; Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10).

The fixed packages are CMFPlone 6.2.3, 6.1.6 and 6.0.16 with the helper package versions the announcement lists, or the hotfix Products.PloneHotfix20261110, which covers Plone 4.3 to 6.2, and all Zope instances must be restarted afterwards (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10). The team's pre-announcement of 2026-11-02 already gave the workaround, to block any URL containing portal_modifier at the web server at any path depth, which only helps if Zope's own port cannot be reached directly; the team advises keeping it after updating (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-02). After the fix, restricted code can import only the names Plone itself needs from the closed modules, so custom scripts that import others now get an Unauthorized error (Plone Security Team, 2026-11-10).

It is a chain of several issues, which together let an anonymous visitor run code on the server.

Plone Security Team 2026-11-10

A working proof of concept exists.

Plone (GitHub Security Advisory, Products.CMFEditions) 2026-11-10

A changed modifier condition stays in the database, also after you install the fix.

Plone Security Team 2026-11-10
vulnerability12 Nov 04:12Zsingle-sourceOpen finding →
NOTABLECVE-2026-119618updatedNATOA2

CVE-2026-119618, Apache HTTP Server 2.4.55 to 2.4.70: a race in mod_http2 assign_headers() corrupts heap memory and leads to remote code execution on servers with HTTP/2 enabled; fixed in 2.4.71, Red Hat calls it unauthenticated and claims public exploit research, no exploitation reported

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.71, released on 2026-11-11, fixes CVE-2026-119618, a race in mod_http2's assign_headers() that the project rates critical and says can lead to remote code execution, in versions 2.4.55 through 2.4.70 (Apache HTTP Server project, 2026-11-11). The project publishes no CVSS score; Red Hat scores it CVSS 3.1 9.8 and says it allows unauthenticated remote code execution, with a worker thread writing into memory owned by the connection thread through a shared lock-free allocator (Red Hat Product Security, 2026-11-11). Red Hat states that only servers with HTTP/2 (h2 or h2c) enabled through the Protocols directive are affected and that HTTP/1.1-only servers are not (Red Hat Product Security, 2026-11-11); the project's own page is silent on that prerequisite (Apache HTTP Server project, 2026-11-11).

On exploitation the sources differ. Wiz wrote at its publication that no exploit was available and no exploitation in the wild was reported (Wiz, 2026-11-11), while Red Hat says public research has demonstrated a reliable exploit against a default-configured server with mod_http2 enabled, without linking it (Red Hat Product Security, 2026-11-11). A researcher has since posted a test setup that reports memory corruption and Apache child-process crashes on 2.4.70, and Wordfence says it does not demonstrate remote command execution (Wordfence, 2026-11-12). No source reports attacks, and the project's advisory carries no exploitation or workaround statement (Apache HTTP Server project, 2026-11-11). Wiz advises disabling HTTP/2 temporarily as the interim measure (Wiz, 2026-11-11).

The upstream fix is 2.4.71. The project lists standalone mod_h2 releases from GitHub, 2.0.8 through 2.0.42, as affected and names no fixed standalone release (Apache HTTP Server project, 2026-11-11). Red Hat shipped mod_http2 errata for RHEL 9 (mod_http2-2.0.26-7.el9_9.1) and RHEL 10 (mod_http2-2.0.29-5.el10_3.1) on 2026-11-11, rates them Important (Red Hat, 2026-11-11; Red Hat, 2026-11-11), says the packages allocate each HTTP/2 stream from a separate allocator, which makes exploitation substantially more complex, and lists RHEL 8 and earlier as not affected (Red Hat Product Security, 2026-11-11); Debian's tracker lists apache2 2.4.71-1~deb12u1 for bookworm (DLA-4902-1) and 2.4.71-1~deb13u1 for trixie (DSA-6620-1) as fixed while forky is still vulnerable (Debian Security Tracker, 2026-11-13), Ubuntu's USN-9090-1 fixes 22.04 LTS to 26.10, and 20.04 LTS through ESM (Ubuntu, 2026-11-12), Alpine 3.21 to 3.24 ship 2.4.71-r0 (Alpine Linux, 2026-11-13) and SUSE lists the issue as pending (SUSE, 2026-11-13).

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server's mod_http2 in assign_headers() can lead to RCE.

Apache HTTP Server project 2026-11-11

Only servers that have HTTP/2 enabled are affected; servers configured to serve only HTTP/1.1 are not vulnerable.

It allows unauthenticated remote code execution, and public research has demonstrated a reliable exploit against a default-configured server with the mod_http2 module enabled.

Red Hat Product Security 2026-11-11

As of the time of this blog’s publication, no exploit is available and there are no reports of exploitation in the wild.

Wiz 2026-11-11

Those results are the researcher’s, and the posted test does not demonstrate remote command execution.

Wordfence 2026-11-12
Updaterun 2026-11-13T0256Z-intelheadlinesummarycvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Debian's tracker now lists apache2 2.4.71-1~deb12u1 for bookworm (DLA-4902-1) and 2.4.71-1~deb13u1 for trixie (DSA-6620-1) as fixed, with forky still vulnerable (Debian Security Tracker, 2026-11-13); Ubuntu's USN-9090-1 fixes 22.04 LTS, 24.04 LTS, 26.04 LTS and 26.10, and 20.04 LTS through ESM (Ubuntu, 2026-11-12) and Alpine 3.21 to 3.24 ship 2.4.71-r0 (Alpine Linux, 2026-11-13), while SUSE lists the issue as pending (SUSE, 2026-11-13). A researcher's public test setup reports memory corruption and Apache child-process crashes on 2.4.70 and a clean run on 2.4.71 (researcher repository, 2026-11-12), and Wordfence says it does not demonstrate remote command execution (Wordfence, 2026-11-12); the researcher's results table records crashes inside the allocator and the HTTP/2 stream code in an instrumented build (researcher repository, 2026-11-12), and the same repository lists mod_h2 2.0.43 as the fixed standalone release.

vulnerability12 Nov 04:12Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →

03Updates to prior coverage8 items

HIGHupdatedNATOA2

PK Softech, software supplier of Swiss pension funds: malware and a data outflow at Publica, with the City of Zurich fund PKZH saying its insured persons' test data was stolen, the Bernese funds BPK and BLVK and Pensionskasse Post also reporting the supplier incident, and the Federal Prosecutor's Office investigating

First published 2026-10-09 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-intelsummarysourcesevidencesourcing_notebody

Publica's own page of 2026-11-10 says the supplier received general extortion letters immediately after the attack, never made concrete with an amount or payment deadline, while PK Softech's page names no letter; watson.ch reports that PK Softech ignores the negotiation-chat prompt Akira left in its network, and SRF's report of a concrete demand with a threat to publish remains unconfirmed by the supplier, Publica and the federal bodies.

Publica's own page, in a correction headed "Stand: 10.11.2026", says that according to current knowledge the affected software supplier received general extortion letters immediately after the attack, which have not since been made concrete with an amount or a payment deadline; that the federal bodies involved know of no concrete ransom demand; that Publica received no demand itself and is in no contact with the attacker group; and that it knows of no case of persons demonstrably contacted or harmed and has no indication of publication on the darkweb (Publica, 2026-11-10). PK Softech's own page of 2026-11-10 mentions no extortion letter and does not name the attackers (PK Softech, 2026-11-10). watson.ch reports that PK Softech confirmed on enquiry that it ignores the prompt Akira left in its network to contact it through an anonymous chat and does not want to negotiate a ransom; watson's reading that the denials mean only that nobody opened the link, and that the firm and the Confederation knew early that Akira was behind the attack, is its own inference (watson.ch, 2026-11-11). SRF reported on 2026-11-10, citing several sources, that the perpetrators demanded ransom and threatened to publish or resell the data, while PK Softech and Publica told SRF that no ransom demand reached them (SRF, 2026-11-10).

NOTABLECVE-2026-91403 +3updatedNATOA1

eMudhra: the private keys of eight ECDSA intermediate CA certificates were trivially recoverable, so anyone could forge trusted HTTPS certificates, and eight RSA intermediates were revoked on 2026-11-07 for key handling eMudhra cannot show compliant; browsers block them, clients with their own trust store or no revocation checking need an update (CVE-2026-111943 in Go)

First published 2026-10-21 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummarysourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

eMudhra's full incident report of 2026-11-10 says eight RSA-4096 issuers (G2B and G2C) were revoked on 2026-11-07 with the reason cessationOfOperation because their keys were handled in the memory of a Python script, so eMudhra cannot show compliance with its policy; it had said on 2026-10-19 that they were not impacted, no source says the keys leaked, and the G2C issuers had issued end-entity certificates.

eMudhra posted its full incident report in the Mozilla bug on 2026-11-10 (eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-11-10). For the eight RSA-4096 issuers (G2B and G2C) it says the key integrity is intact, all signatures verifying, but that during re-import the private-key material was handled in the volatile memory of a Python process on the ceremony host, which is not consistent with its certification practice statement, so the RSA issuers are treated as not meeting it; it adds that logs cannot reliably establish or exclude how that material was handled (eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-11-10). It identified this in early November after a root-program discussion, revoked the eight issuers on 2026-11-07 with the reason cessationOfOperation, not the compromise reason used for the ECDSA set, and had written on 2026-10-19 that the RSA issuers were not impacted (eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-11-10; eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-10-19). The G2C issuers were put into production in May 2026 and issued end-entity certificates, the last on 2026-11-03, after which issuance from them stopped; BleepingComputer reports that eMudhra says the affected customer certificates were replaced or migrated, and that the company has not detected malicious use of the keys (eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-11-10; BleepingComputer, 2026-11-11). eMudhra also decided to exit public TLS, with all issuance from its emSign Root CA - G1 hierarchy to stop before 2026-11-16 and an independent review due 2026-12-04 (eMudhra, Mozilla bug 2083449, 2026-11-10). No page read from Google, Microsoft, Apple, Mozilla or the incident tracker names the G2B or G2C issuers or says a vendor blocked them.

Sources: Google (Chrome Root Program and Android Security) · Dennis Jackson (eMudhra intermediate CA compromise incident tracker) · Mozilla Security Blog · Go team (golang-announce) · BleepingComputer · Oracle (Security Alert CVE-2026-91403) · OpenJDK (Vulnerability Advisory 2026/10/21) · NCSC.ch Security Hub (advisory 13091) · Oracle (Security Alert CVE-2026-114820) · OpenJDK (Vulnerability Advisory 2026/10/24) · OpenJDK (Compromised Certificates and OpenJDK Java Runtimes) · Python Software Foundation (security-announce, CVE-2026-115557) · ENISA EUVD (EUVD-2026-109299) · Cisco PSIRT (cisco-sa-emudhra-info, version 1.1) · Python Discourse (eMudhra information for Python users) · The Hacker News · eMudhra (press release) · Microsoft Security Response Center (updated 2026-10-27) · Cisco PSIRT (cisco-sa-emudhra-info, version 1.5) · GitLab (patch release 19.5.3) · Python Insider (release post) · Dennis Jackson (eMudhra intermediate CA compromise incident tracker, update of 28 October) · Oracle (Security Alert CVE-2026-114820, revision 2) · Cisco PSIRT (cisco-sa-emudhra-info, version 1.8) · Google (Chrome Root Program and Android Security, update of 2026-11-04) · Apple Support (information on the compromised eMudhra intermediate CAs, translated from German) · heise online (translated from German) · SonicWall (informational advisory SNWLID-2026-0021) · SonicWall PSIRT (advisory data for SNWLID-2026-0021) · Apple Support (information on the compromised eMudhra intermediate CAs, revised 2026-11-10, translated from German) · Microsoft Security Response Center (updated 2026-11-10) · Cisco PSIRT (cisco-sa-emudhra-info, version 1.9) · eMudhra (Mozilla CA Program bug 2083449, full incident report) · eMudhra (Mozilla CA Program bug 2083449, comment 11)
HIGHCVE-2026-58115exploitedupdatedNATOA2

CVE-2026-58115, Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced, Basic, M.2 and SM ship a Node-RED interface with no authentication, so one unauthenticated HTTP request runs code with maximum privileges on an OT edge gateway (CVSS 10.0); VulnCheck's canary caught exploitation

First published 2026-08-13 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-intelheadlinesummarycvesevidenceactionsbody

Siemens revised SSA-834709 to V1.2 on 2026-11-10 and added a second affected configuration for each of the four IoT2050 variants, all versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed, for which no fix is available; the V4.3.4-1 fix and the interim mitigations apply only as stated for Industrial OS and Node-RED.

Siemens revised SSA-834709 to V1.2 on 2026-11-10, describing the change as "Added additional affected configuration for SIMATIC IoT2050 family" (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-08-11). For each of the four variants the advisory now lists a second affected configuration, "All versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed", for which "Currently no fix is available"; the fix, update to V4.3.4-1 or later, applies only to the Industrial OS configurations, and the two mitigations, hardening Node-RED and uninstalling it, apply to all eight (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-08-11). The advisory's title and summary still say "with Industrial OS", Siemens does not define Example Image, and the advisory makes no statement on exploitation; VulnCheck remains the only exploitation source (VulnCheck, 2026-11-01).

NOTABLECVE-2026-111497exploitedupdatedNATOA2

CVE-2026-111497, Brotli decoder flaw in Siemens industrial and software products (Desigo CC, SIMATIC WinCC, Industrial Edge, Teamcenter and Opcenter among them), Mitel MiVoice Business and OpenScape, with Cisco listing Duo Network Gateway and RoomOS in its combined advisory: Desigo CC takes the .NET updates, while most Siemens products, the Mitel updates and the Industrial Edge Common Configurator fix are still pending

First published 2026-11-07 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummaryaffected_productscvessourcessourcing_noteactionsbodyentities

Siemens' advisories SSA-242944 and SSA-678870 of 2026-11-10 extend the exploited Brotli flaw to 15 industrial and 28 software products, among them SIMATIC WinCC, the User Management Component, TIA Administrator, Teamcenter and the Opcenter family; only WinCC OA V3.20 and BRAUMAT and SISTAR have a fix, and the mitigations differ by product, with none listed for some.

Siemens published SSA-242944 and SSA-678870 on 2026-11-10, each still interim, extending CVE-2026-111497 to 15 industrial and 28 software products (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10; Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10). Fixes exist only for SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 below V3.20 P17.1 (update to V3.20 P17.1) and for BRAUMAT and SISTAR V8.2 Update 1 to below Update 5 (update to V8.2 Update 5); Siemens plans no fix for the SIMATIC Profiling Tool and lists none available for SIMATIC WinCC V7/V8, WinCC Unified, WinCC Runtime Professional, WinCC Companion, WinCC OA V3.21, TIA Administrator, the User Management Component, COMOS Walkinside, the Project Server Web Administration Tool or, in the software advisory, any of the 28 products, among them Teamcenter V2412 to V2606, the Opcenter family, PADS and Xpedition (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10; Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10). For the industrial products the mitigation is to disable Brotli compression and decompression at the application or proxy layer where it is not required, and the User Management Component and, when UMC authentication is enabled, TIA Administrator also get an IIS request-filtering rule that denies the value br in the Content-Encoding header (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10). For the software products Siemens points Teamcenter, the Opcenter family and Process Preparation X to knowledge-base articles that need a Siemens login and were not readable without one, tells HyperLynx, PADS and Xpedition to disable Brotli compression and block it at the network firewall, and lists no mitigation for Innexis Architecture Native Acceleration, Insights Hub, PAVE360 Automotive and Simcenter Executable Digital Twin and Studio (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10). Polarion, Solid Edge, Calibre, Capital and four other software products are listed as not affected because Node.js is not present or predates Brotli (Siemens ProductCERT, 2026-11-10). Neither advisory says anything about exploitation; the exploited status rests on CISA's listing.

HIGHCVE-2026-126147 +18updatedNATOA2

Fortinet coordinated security hardening release: the advisories published on 2026-11-10 carry unauthenticated FortiMail, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiOS and FortiAuthenticator flaws rated CVSS up to 9.8; FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 8.0 have no fixed build for the JSON API flaw, FortiOS 7.0 and FortiMail 7.2 are left out of the October fixes

First published 2026-10-23 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummarycvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Fortinet's advisories of 2026-11-10 carry ten more critical rows than the nine first listed across FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiOS, FortiMail and FortiClient, and the October builds do not fix every row: FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 8.0 have no fixed build for CVE-2026-126170 until 8.0.3, FortiMail 7.2 awaits 7.2.10 for CVE-2026-126150, and FortiOS 7.0 and FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2 and 7.0 must migrate.

The advisory pages carry ten more critical rows (CVSS 9.0 or higher), shown above, and the October builds do not fix every row: FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.2 have no fixed build for CVE-2026-126170 until the upcoming 8.0.3 (Fortinet PSIRT, 2026-11-10), FortiMail 7.2 awaits 7.2.10 for CVE-2026-126150 (Fortinet PSIRT, 2026-11-10), FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2 and 7.0 must migrate for CVE-2026-126229 (Fortinet PSIRT, 2026-11-10), and FortiOS 7.0 must migrate for CVE-2026-126253 and CVE-2026-126259 (Fortinet PSIRT, 2026-11-10) (Fortinet PSIRT, 2026-11-10).

NOTABLECVE-2026-109618 +1exploitedupdatedNATOA2

CVE-2026-109618 / CVE-2026-109619, PHP2Shell in management servers and storage: Trend Micro released critical patches for Apex Central and Apex One server on 2026-11-11 while Mobile Security for Enterprise and Deep Discovery Analyzer still await theirs, Quest KACE SMA and SDA have fixes and should block ports 80, 443 and 52230 until patched, and NetApp ONTAP 9 is affected by CVE-2026-109618 only, inside the PHP jail

First published 2026-10-29 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummarycvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Trend Micro released critical patches for Apex Central (build 7351, whose readme names PHP2Shell) and Apex One Service Pack 1 (build 20113, whose readme names no flaw) on 2026-11-11, both upgrading PHP to 8.2.35, while its advisory, last updated 2026-11-04, still shows both as awaiting patches; Mobile Security for Enterprise and Deep Discovery Analyzer remain pending.

Trend Micro's Download Center dates critical patches for Apex Central (build 7351) and Apex One Service Pack 1 (build 20113) to 2026-11-11 (Trend Micro Download Center, 2026-11-11; Trend Micro Download Center, 2026-11-11). The Apex Central readme says its patch upgrades the PHP module to 8.2.35 and names PHP2Shell (Trend Micro, 2026-11-05); the Apex One readme says it updates the PHP module to 8.2.35 and does not name the flaw (Trend Micro, 2026-11-09). Its advisory has not been revised since 2026-11-04 and still lists the 11 November ETA; Mobile Security for Enterprise (due 2026-11-17) and Deep Discovery Analyzer (due 2026-11-12) still show as impacted (Trend Micro, 2026-11-04), and the Download Center pages of those two products list no matching patch as of 2026-11-12 (Trend Micro Download Center, 2026-11-12; Trend Micro Download Center, 2026-11-12).

HIGHCVE-2026-54121updatedNATOB2

CVE-2026-54121, Windows Server AD CS 'Certighost': a low-privileged domain user forges a DC certificate to DCSync, public PoC since 2026-07-24 and attempted in real intrusions by the Citrus ransomware group (CVSS 8.8)

First published 2026-07-25 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummarysourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbodycves

Kaspersky reported on 2026-11-11 that the Citrus ransomware group attempted Certighost in intrusions that began with stolen contractor VPN and RDP credentials, leaving machine accounts named GHOST plus eight random letters; it does not say an attempt succeeded and Microsoft's record still lists no confirmed exploitation.

Kaspersky's Citrus report of 2026-11-11 says the group attempted to exploit Certighost with an exploit published on GitHub, requesting a Machine-template certificate on behalf of a newly created account with the cdc attribute pointing the CA at a system it controlled, and that the group later deploys its Go ransomware domain-wide through a malicious Group Policy Object (Kaspersky, 2026-11-11). Kaspersky says that if exploitation succeeds the CA issues the certificate and the domain controller name in it lets the attackers authenticate as the domain controller account, and it never says an attempt succeeded (Kaspersky, 2026-11-11); Microsoft's record has not been revised since 2026-07-14 (Microsoft MSRC, 2026-07-14).

HIGHCVE-2026-125350exploitedupdatedNATOA1

CVE-2026-125350, Google Chrome before 157.0.8103.50: a use-after-free in the XML component is exploited in the wild and listed by CISA; Edge for Android carries the fix, Edge desktop and other Chromium browsers are still to follow

First published 2026-11-11 · open finding →

Updaterun 2026-11-12T0255Z-inteltitleheadlinesummarycvessourcesevidencesourcing_noteactionsbody

Microsoft's Edge notes now list the exploited-flaw fix in Edge for Android 157.0.4341.53 while no Edge desktop release names it, Extended Stable 156.0.8078.96 of 2026-11-09 already carried the fix, and Stable 157.0.8103.78/.79 and Extended Stable 156.0.8078.100 of 2026-11-11 replace the first fixed builds as the update target; Google's Stable page files a second XML bug under the exploited CVE while its Extended Stable page lists it under its own id.

Google released Stable 157.0.8103.78/.79 on 2026-11-11 with 83 security fixes, five of them Critical use-after-free bugs (Google, 2026-11-11), and Extended Stable 156.0.8078.100 the same day with 72 fixes, four of them Critical (Google, 2026-11-11); neither post lists the XML use-after-free again, and both builds are later than the fixed ones. Microsoft's Edge release notes of the same day list Edge for Android 157.0.4341.53 as containing the fix, while the newest Edge desktop release on the page is 157.0.4341.42 of 2026-11-05 and names no CVE (Microsoft, 2026-11-11). Google's Stable page for 157.0.8103.50 files Chromium bug 572578603 inside the row for the exploited flaw (Google, 2026-11-09). Its Extended Stable page of the same day lists the same bug as a separate High row under its own CVE id (Google, 2026-11-09); both pages list it as fixed and differ only on its CVE id.

04Action items18 items

Verification & coverage notes1 run

2026-11-12T0255Z-intel · Sonnet 5.5 · window 26 h · 6 entries published

Verification & coverage notes

Window: standard 26 h (gap to the previous fire 24.0 h). KEV sweep: no catalogue additions in the window and no ransomware-flag flips on covered entries. Held backlog row left untouched: zohe-hainaut-est (no source found, expiry 2026-11-17).

  • borderline-drop: Node.js 2026-11-11 security releases (seven high CVEs), scheduled release, no exploitation or PoC, regular patch cycle (PD-11 b)
  • borderline-drop: Mitel MiVoice MX-ONE MISA-2026-0011, LAN-access prerequisite, CVE ids pending, no exploitation
  • borderline-drop: Adobe Experience Manager APSB26-189, low-privilege rows, no exploitation, regular cycle
  • borderline-drop: Arista EOS BGP stack overflow CVE-2026-121289, needs a BGP peer, no exploitation
  • borderline-drop: PTC Windchill CVE-2026-126325, CNA record only, no fix or technical detail readable
  • borderline-drop: Xen XSA-529/530, timing inference of the XAPI pool secret, no exploitation, primary 7 h before window
  • borderline-drop: Red Hat Quay CVE-2026-123710, scores preliminary, no fixed build named, no exploitation
  • borderline-drop: React Server Components CVE-2026-126187, vendor advisories of 14/22 Oct, narrow condition, no confirmed exploitation
  • borderline-drop: PAN-OS November batch, Checkmk, Rails 8.0.5.2/8.1.4.1, git v2.56.1, Firefox 160/ESR, Zoom ZSB-26023, routine monthly releases or authenticated/user-interaction flaws, no exploitation
  • borderline-drop: Ubuntu tracker status for CVE-2026-98432; Ivanti CVE-2026-121683 contradictory CNA record, incremental, no decision changes
  • borderline-drop: France summons Iran's ambassador / Iran rejects Danfoss attribution, diplomatic track, no technical delta (would re-float a high entry)
  • borderline-drop: ARTEX successor frameworks (Unit 42/Sophos/Arctic Wolf AntiFox), marginal delta on an entry already past its word bound
  • borderline-drop: Build Card ClickFix kit (Report URI), single source, commodity technique
  • borderline-drop: SpecterOps multi-tenant Entra app explainer, no new incident fact, audit step already in the ConnectWise and exposed-credentials entries
  • borderline-drop: Poland ePUAP offline, vector and actor undisclosed, no Swiss link (incident floor)
  • borderline-drop: MongoDB CVE-2026-118383, replica-set peer path, crash only reproduced, no exploitation
  • borderline-drop: Report URI scan data on the APT29 watering hole, marginal delta
  • borderline-drop: Kaspersky IT threat evolution Q3 2026, detection counts, no defender takeaway
  • borderline-drop: PowerFolder cloud breach and /wopi/ server flaw, no CVE, no technical detail, no constituency deployment shown
  • borderline-drop: CNIL ten sanctions on French territorial authorities, generic hardening failings, no Swiss obligation change
  • borderline-drop: University of Tuebingen, Gleis D Chur (Cloak), INCERT eTourismus (Zermatt Tourismus), Maileva, Notion/Fireworks AI, Maersk, private or foreign victims without a stated transferable technique or vector (incident floor)

Verification: four iterations. Iteration 1 found 29 findings (16 truth, 6 editorial, 7 advisory), iteration 2 found 19, iteration 3 found 9 (one new upstream fact: Huntress updated its ScreenConnect post with the RMM+ blank-access-key finding), and iteration 4 returned NEEDS_FIXES with truth 2 and editorial 0 and no F1 or F4, so decision rule 5 applied: the five findings were remediated, the gate re-run clean (58 pass, 0 warn, 0 fail), and the fire published on that early exit without a fifth pass. No double-CLEAN was reached; the two residual truth findings are fixed but unverified by a further cold pass, and the audit should give the ScreenConnect and Fortinet entries an independent read.

Operational notes: the jina reader pool is dead (every key HTTP 402), so pages that only the reader could serve were read by WebFetch or reported as unconfirmed. Research workers FU2 left six stray stub files at the filesystem root (/A_chrome_android.md, /A_chrome_android.err, /A_chrome_extended_156.md, /A_chrome_extended_156.err, /A_edge_security.md, /A_edge_security.err); the sandbox safety check denied deleting them and the run did not work around it, so the operator may remove them. They hold fetch scratch output only and are not part of the repo.

Gate note for the audit: check_run.py citation-cve matches an id against a skeleton that joins the id to the digits of the next bug number on Chrome Releases rows, so a clause naming CVE-2026-125346 on the Extended Stable page reads as a miss although the id is on the page; the Chrome entry avoids naming the id there. The three KEV additions the verifier listed for 2026-11-09 and 2026-11-10 without entries (CVE-2026-20320 Cisco BroadWorks, CVE-2026-102895 GPUStack, CVE-2026-111793 Openwave Webtop) were dispositioned as borderline-drops by the 2026-11-10 and 2026-11-11 fires and are left for the audit sweep. The main analyses of the Publica (1100 words) and eMudhra (895) entries stay above the 550-word bound as before this fire, for the audit to restructure.

Source health: seven records stay UNSOLVED. Fixed this run: ico-uk, safeonweb-be, netzwoche (recipes in sources_changed). Left for a refilled reader pool or a changed host: schneier (blog and atom feed 403 on every free transport), belden-psirt (403 direct), ahnlab-asec (WebFetch reads it; bridge and extract do not), mozilla-ca-compliance-bugzilla (the REST recipe reads, its rows carry no security vocabulary the health check recognises).

  • Essential-coverage: every essential record was attempted. Coverage gaps: connectwise-trust-center (403 on every transport), sygnia (403), Siemens knowledge-base articles (login-gated), news-admin-ch, srf-news and swissinfo-ger (shallow reach through the listing recipes), the NCSC.ch BACS card recipe, ictjournal-ch, and rapid7's RSS (malformed).
  • Watchlist: none configured.