CTIPilot
AI-generated · no human review · verify critical claims against the linked source. how it works →

Intel TDX

product · product:intel-tdx

Coverage
1
first 2026-09-17 → last 2026-09-30
Latest activity
2026-09-17
Researchers show a cheap hardware add-on can forge Intel TDX attestation reports by tampering with memory…
Peak priority
routine
1 routine
Targets
public-sector
sectors: public-sector, technology
Sources cited
4
4 hosts

Defender insights

What each entry about Intel TDX tells a defender to do, newest first.

2026-09-17ROUTINEResearchers show a cheap hardware add-on can forge Intel TDX attestation reports by tampering with memory writes at the DRAM bus

Story timeline

  1. 2026-09-17DDRop: a $159 DDR5 hardware interposer silently drops targeted memory writes, defeating Intel TDX/SGX and AMD SEV-SNP integrity guarantees, with no vendor fix
    researchResearchers show a cheap hardware add-on can forge Intel TDX attestation reports by tampering with memory writes at the DRAM bus

Hunting pivots

Releases covered
Intel TDX
Tags
ATT&CK techniques (2 across 2 tactics)

2 techniques observed across 1 entry about this entity, derived from entry metadata and body evidence, never asserted without a published entry behind it · pinned to MITRE ATT&CK v19.2 · compare on the matrix · Navigator layer (JSON)

  • Initial AccessHardware Additions
  • Defense ImpairmentSubvert Trust Controls

Initial Access TA0001

T1200Hardware Additions×1

Adversaries may physically introduce computer accessories, networking hardware, or other computing devices into a system or network that can be used as a vector to gain access. Rather than just connecting and distributing payloads via removable storage (i.e. Replication Through Removable Media), more robust hardware additions can be used to introduce new functionalities and/or features into a system that can then be abused.

Evidence: 2026-09-17/ddrop-dram-interposer-defeats-confidential-computing · ATT&CK page ↗

Defense Impairment TA0112

T1553Subvert Trust Controls×1

Adversaries may undermine security controls that will either warn users of untrusted activity or prevent execution of untrusted programs. Operating systems and security products may contain mechanisms to identify programs or websites as possessing some level of trust. Examples of such features would include a program being allowed to run because it is signed by a valid code signing certificate, a program prompting the user with a warning because it has an attribute set from being downloaded from the Internet, or getting an indication that you are about to connect to an untrusted site.

Evidence: 2026-09-17/ddrop-dram-interposer-defeats-confidential-computing · ATT&CK page ↗

Entries about Intel TDX (1)

2026-09-17 · view entry permalink →

ROUTINEupdatedNATOB1

DDRop: a $159 DDR5 hardware interposer silently drops targeted memory writes, defeating Intel TDX/SGX and AMD SEV-SNP integrity guarantees, with no vendor fix

Researchers from KU Leuven, ETH Zurich, Durham University and Google disclosed DDRop, an open-source DDR5 hardware interposer that costs about $159 in parts and, unlike earlier passive interposers, runs at native bus speed (DDRop research team, 2026-09-14). It forges a parity error on a targeted write and suppresses the alert, so the memory module silently drops the write and stale, attacker-chosen ciphertext stays in place. Against Intel TDX this corrupts the TDX module's initialization of Secure Extended Page Tables, so an attacker-controlled Trust Domain can remap its memory onto other physical memory. Under TDX's default logical integrity mode that lets the attacker flip a victim Trust Domain's debug attribute and read its memory through the hypervisor's debug API, and even under cryptographic integrity mode the attacker can forge the launch measurement of a rogue VM of their own so that it passes remote attestation (DDRop research team, 2026-09-14).

The attack needs a brief, one-time visit to install the interposer, which takes minutes, on top of the standard confidential-computing threat model in which the adversary controls the hypervisor and BIOS. The researchers name data-center insiders, supply-chain tampering and hardware access compelled by law enforcement or governments as ways to get that access (DDRop research team, 2026-09-14). Intel and AMD both place physical attacks on the memory bus outside their threat models; AMD does not plan to assign a CVE, and Intel is evaluating further hardening and detection options (Intel PSIRT, 2026-09-14; AMD Product Security, 2026-09-15). Schematics, board files, firmware and proof-of-concept code are public (DDRop research team, 2026-09-14), and no in-the-wild use is claimed.

DDRop is a small, low-cost hardware interposer device that can make writes to a server's memory disappear, causing the computer to read old data as if it were newly written.

This primitive is 100% deterministic and lets an attacker-controlled TD remap its own memory onto any physical address in RAM.

DDRop research team

Intel's analysis confirms that the described scenarios fall outside Intel's standard threat model for confidential computing deployments.

Intel PSIRT 2026-09-14

AMD has assessed this report and has determined that the described technique relies on a physical attack against the memory bus, which falls outside the scope of the published threat model for SEV-SNP. AMD does not plan to assign a CVE or release mitigations in response to this report.

AMD Product Security (AMD-SB-3048) 2026-09-15
Correctionrun 2026-09-30T0639Z-auditprioritybodysummarytitle

Intel and AMD acknowledged the findings and place physical attacks on the memory bus outside their threat models (DDRop research team, 2026-09-14). Only AMD says it does not plan to assign a CVE or release mitigations (AMD Product Security, 2026-09-15). Intel's announcement does not mention a CVE and says Intel is evaluating additional architectural hardening options and detection mechanisms (Intel PSIRT, 2026-09-14). The earlier statement that both vendors confirmed the findings and that neither is assigning a CVE went beyond what they published.

research17 Sep 04:44Zmulti-sourceOpen finding →

Co-occurring entities

Derived: referenced by the same focused operational entries (weekly summaries and report roundups don't count); ×N counts the shared entries.

Where this entity is cited

  • Research1

Source distribution

  • amd.com1 (25%)
  • ddropattack.eu1 (25%)
  • heise.de1 (25%)
  • intel.com1 (25%)